Electric Cars

Nissan finds itself at the center of a legal battle, facing a class-action lawsuit that alleges severe defects in its innovative VC-Turbo engines. These engines, a cornerstone of Nissan's advanced technology and also integrated into specific Infiniti models, are accused of experiencing critical failures. Owners report a range of serious issues, from sudden power loss and rough idling to complete engine shutdowns. The plaintiffs assert that despite these widespread problems, Nissan has not only failed to provide adequate remedies but has also neglected its responsibility, leaving consumers burdened with significant repair costs. Furthermore, the lawsuit contends that a recent recall initiated by Nissan is insufficient to address the underlying flaws, highlighting a persistent pattern of non-disclosure and cost-shifting onto consumers. This dispute casts a shadow over a technology that Nissan once championed as a significant leap forward in automotive engineering.

The core of the class action lawsuit revolves around the purported unreliability of Nissan's VC-Turbo engines, which represent a pioneering effort in variable compression ratio technology. This innovation, designed to dynamically adjust engine performance for optimal fuel economy or power output, is now the subject of numerous complaints from affected vehicle owners. The legal challenge underscores the stark contrast between the engine's initial promise and its real-world performance, as detailed by disgruntled consumers who have experienced unexpected and costly breakdowns. This situation raises critical questions about the durability and engineering integrity of these advanced powerplants, as well as Nissan's approach to addressing post-purchase reliability issues.

The Alleged Engine Defects and Nissan's Response

Nissan is currently facing a class action lawsuit regarding its VC-Turbo engines, which are also used in some Infiniti models. The lawsuit alleges that these engines suffer from significant malfunctions, leaving customers with substantial repair costs. Plaintiffs claim that issues such as main-bearing failures lead to engine hesitation, high-pitched noises, rough idling, power loss, and sudden stalls. The lawsuit contends that Nissan has not adequately addressed these defects and has shifted the financial burden of repairs onto consumers. Despite a recent recall, the plaintiffs argue it is insufficient, covering only minor services rather than addressing the core mechanical problems. The suit also suggests that Nissan routinely denies engine issues until warranties expire, further exacerbating the financial strain on owners.

The class action lawsuit targets Nissan's VC-Turbo engines, notably found in 2021-2023 Nissan Rogue crossovers, 2019-2023 Nissan Altima sedans, and 2019-2023 Infiniti QX50 crossovers, including the QX55 variant. These engines, once lauded for their variable compression ratio technology, designed to enhance fuel efficiency and power, are now at the center of serious reliability claims. Owners report sudden engine malfunctions, often after minimal mileage, leading to warnings like "Engine Malfunction" and "Power Reduced." One plaintiff, Dennis Becker, recounted his 2023 Nissan Rogue stalling and becoming inoperable after just 157 miles. The lawsuit asserts that Nissan has failed to honor warranty obligations, forcing owners to cover expensive diagnostics and repairs. Furthermore, the legal action dismisses Nissan's recent recall as inadequate, claiming it primarily offers minor services like oil changes rather than comprehensive engine replacements. This situation highlights the disparity between the engine's innovative concept and its reported real-world performance, questioning Nissan's commitment to its customers and product reliability.

The Unfulfilled Promise of Variable Compression Technology

The lawsuit underscores the significant reliability concerns surrounding Nissan's VC-Turbo engines, a technology initially celebrated as a groundbreaking advancement. These engines were designed to dynamically adjust their compression ratios, promising an unprecedented blend of fuel efficiency and robust power output without the complexities of hybrid systems. However, consumer reports and the current legal action suggest that this promise has largely gone unfulfilled. Instead, owners have encountered severe and unpredictable engine failures, leading to substantial repair expenses and a decline in confidence in the much-hyped technology. This raises questions about the practical application and long-term viability of what was once considered a revolutionary automotive innovation.

When Nissan introduced its VC-Turbo engines, they were heralded as a major engineering feat, offering the automotive industry a solution to the long-standing challenge of variable compression ratios, a concept that many other manufacturers had struggled to commercialize. The technology was intended to provide an ideal balance between performance and fuel economy by seamlessly shifting between different compression levels. For instance, the 2.0-liter inline-four VC-Turbo Altima boasted impressive horsepower and fuel efficiency figures. However, the real-world experience has fallen short of these lofty expectations. The lawsuit highlights a pattern of severe reliability issues that contradict the initial promise of this innovative engine. Nissan has since discontinued the VC-Turbo engine in the Altima for the 2025 model year and has even ceased production of the Infiniti QX50 and QX55 models, which also featured this engine. While the 1.5-liter turbo-three VC-Turbo engine is still used in the Rogue, the overall underwhelming sales performance across all models equipped with this technology suggests that it has not achieved the transformative impact Nissan had envisioned. This outcome points to the complex challenges of bringing pioneering engine technologies to mass production and maintaining consistent performance and reliability.

A striking online account has brought to light the dramatic depreciation luxury vehicles can experience. This story centers on a 2022 Maserati Levante, originally acquired for a substantial sum, which has since plummeted in market value. The owner's situation serves as a potent illustration of the financial implications associated with purchasing certain high-end automobiles, particularly when considering their rapid decline in worth. This narrative has ignited broader discussions concerning prudent vehicle acquisition strategies, advocating for alternative approaches such as leasing or investing in pre-owned luxury models to mitigate significant financial losses.

The individual in question, whose experience garnered widespread attention on TikTok, invested approximately $130,000 in a new 2022 Maserati Levante. However, in a surprisingly short period, the car's market value plummeted to merely $20,000. This substantial reduction in worth left the owner facing a negative equity of $21,000 on the outstanding loan, despite having an excellent credit score and a favorable interest rate. The financial advisor, Yusuf, consulted by the owner, pointed out that transferring this negative equity to a new vehicle would only exacerbate the financial strain due to continued depreciation. Consequently, Yusuf's advice leaned towards leasing as a more financially sound option for such vehicles, acknowledging that it might entail higher monthly payments.

The dilemma faced by the Maserati owner underscores a critical aspect of luxury car ownership: the accelerated rate of depreciation. Industry experts confirm that high-end vehicles often lose a significant portion of their value shortly after purchase. For instance, data indicates that the Maserati Levante specifically experiences a steep 70 percent depreciation within just two years of ownership, with half of that loss occurring in the first year alone. This rapid decline is largely attributed to the perception of reliability and maintenance costs associated with many luxury brands compared to their more mainstream counterparts. This trend leads to a consensus among many automotive enthusiasts and financial consultants that buying a luxury car new is often a poor financial decision.

The woman's predicament ultimately led her to a profound realization: the desire to maintain a luxurious image was no longer worth the financial burden. She expressed a sentiment of being "humbled" by the experience, opting to retain the vehicle and pay off the remaining loan, thereby avoiding further car payments in the future. This decision highlights a shift in perspective from prioritizing luxury ownership to embracing financial pragmatism. The consensus from car experts and experienced owners alike strongly suggests that for a Maserati, and similar luxury brands, the most financially sensible approach is to acquire them on the secondary market after the initial owner has absorbed the substantial depreciation.

To avoid similar financial pitfalls, particularly being 'upside down' on a car loan where the outstanding debt exceeds the vehicle's market value, several strategies are recommended. Firstly, a substantial down payment on a vehicle can significantly reduce the loan amount, thereby minimizing the impact of depreciation. Secondly, opting for a used car, especially in the luxury segment, can be a smarter move, as the initial sharp depreciation has already occurred. Lastly, choosing shorter loan repayment periods and being mindful of interest rates can help ensure that the vehicle's value doesn't decline faster than the loan balance, thus safeguarding against negative equity.