Electric Cars

Xiaomi SU7 Ultra: A Game Changer in the EV Market

The Xiaomi SU7 Ultra has left a significant impression on automotive experts, signaling a potential shift in the high-performance electric vehicle market. Its remarkable blend of cutting-edge technology, luxurious appointments, and blistering speed, all offered at an unexpectedly accessible price point, has drawn considerable attention. This vehicle, still primarily available in China but with a hopeful expansion to European and potentially North American markets, is positioned as a formidable rival to established luxury EVs, particularly the Porsche Taycan. Reviewers have lauded its interior quality, advanced infotainment system, and its ability to deliver an exhilarating driving experience that challenges preconceptions about electric cars from emerging manufacturers.

Carwow's Mat Watson recently provided a comprehensive review of the Xiaomi SU7 Ultra in the UK, expressing profound admiration for its capabilities and value. The SU7 Ultra, currently holding the title of the fastest EV around the Nurburgring, outperforms notable competitors like the Tesla Model S and the most potent versions of the Porsche Taycan in terms of track performance. In the Chinese market, the SU7 Ultra is priced at approximately 529,900 yuan, which converts to just under $75,000. This pricing strategy places it at roughly half the cost of a base model Porsche Taycan in the same region, presenting an incredibly attractive proposition for consumers seeking high performance without the premium price tag. Even if its European launch sees a price increase to around $100,000, it would still represent a compelling value, significantly undercutting rivals offering comparable levels of power and features.

Watson particularly commended the SU7 Ultra's meticulously crafted interior, which features extensive use of carbon fiber and Alcantara, materials typically found in high-end sports cars. He highlighted the responsiveness of the touchscreen interface, noting that many Chinese-made vehicles integrate powerful processors and superior technology, a trend evident in the SU7 Ultra's intuitive and feature-rich infotainment system. The clarity and detail of the vehicle's camera system also garnered praise, with Watson remarking on the excellent image quality. Adding to the vehicle's sophisticated appeal, the vanity mirror lights offer adjustable brightness and tone, while the front Xiaomi badge is crafted from carbon fiber and 24-carat gold, underscoring the attention to detail and premium aspirations.

The value proposition of the Xiaomi SU7 Ultra, according to Watson, is nothing short of exceptional. He emphasized that in terms of overall value, encompassing aesthetics, driving dynamics, and build quality, the vehicle is flawless, unequivocally stating it to be his favorite Chinese car to date. This high praise stems from the impressive array of features and performance capabilities packed into its price. The top-tier model boasts a tri-motor powertrain that generates a staggering 1,526 horsepower, with motors capable of reaching up to 27,200 rpm, a figure surpassing most other electric vehicle production motors. The immediate and powerful acceleration, delivering 1,305 lb-ft of torque, firmly presses occupants into their seats. However, Watson noted that the power delivery is finely tuned to be somewhat more progressive than that of competitors like the Tesla Model S Plaid, providing a more controlled yet still exhilarating experience on the highway, which he described as "berserk."

While the SU7 Ultra has a claimed 0-62 mph acceleration time of 1.98 seconds, a figure that reviewers often find challenging to replicate precisely, its sustained acceleration up to 217 mph without any noticeable decrease in potency is truly remarkable. Watson also lauded the Xiaomi's steering, describing it as "stable and predictable," and deeming it the best he has encountered in a Chinese car. Despite these numerous strengths, a few minor criticisms emerged. Watson observed that the Ultra's brakes can be somewhat squeaky and engage with unexpected force when transitioning from regenerative braking to friction braking. Additionally, the rear-view camera, while offering excellent image quality, lacks a spray nozzle for cleaning, an oversight in an otherwise meticulously designed vehicle. He also noted that while the car shares a general feel with the Taycan, it doesn't quite match its handling confidence.

In essence, the Xiaomi SU7 represents an extraordinary achievement, offering an unparalleled combination of performance and value in the electric vehicle sector. Its standard features, including air suspension and ceramic brake rotors, position it well above its price competitors. Configuring a Porsche Taycan with similar specifications would entail an expense nearly three times greater, yet it would still fall short of the SU7 Ultra's raw straight-line speed. This dominance in performance is underscored by its Nurburgring lap record, a feat that has reportedly spurred Porsche to develop an even more extreme version of the Taycan to reclaim the title. Despite being Xiaomi's inaugural venture into automotive manufacturing, the company has delivered an impressive product that seamlessly combines track-ready dynamics with daily drivability, compelling established automakers across the globe to take notice of this new force in the industry. The success of its subsequent model, the YU7 crossover, further solidifies Xiaomi's burgeoning reputation in the automotive world.

Tesla's Strategy: Stripped-Down Autopilot in Affordable Models to Boost FSD Sales

Tesla's recent decision to reduce the functionality of its Autopilot system in the more budget-friendly Model 3 and Model Y Standard variants has stirred considerable discussion. By omitting the lane-centering feature, a core component of Autopilot, the company appears to be employing a calculated move to direct consumers toward its premium Full Self-Driving (FSD) software. This strategic shift, while intended to enhance FSD adoption, has raised questions about the overall value these stripped-down models offer to buyers.

Tesla's Autopilot Feature Reduction Sparks Debate Over FSD Sales Strategy

In a notable development, Tesla introduced more affordable versions of its Model 3 and Model Y vehicles, known as the \"Standard\" trims. However, this cost reduction came with a significant change: the standard Autopilot system in these models no longer includes the lane-centering feature, officially termed \"Autosteer.\" This alteration has drawn attention from automotive enthusiasts and industry observers alike.

A prominent figure in the Tesla community, YouTuber \"Everyday Chris,\" shared insights gleaned directly from Tesla representatives. During an exclusive preview of the new Model Y Standard, Chris was informed that the removal of Autosteer was a strategic choice by the automaker. The company's rationale is to create a more compelling incentive for buyers of these cheaper models to invest in the more advanced Full Self-Driving software, which carries an $8,000 price tag or can be acquired through a monthly subscription of $99.

This means that while the Standard trims offer a price reduction of approximately $5,000 compared to their more equipped counterparts, customers seeking the full suite of driver-assistance features, particularly lane centering, would need to spend an additional sum on FSD. This effectively makes the total cost for a fully capable system potentially higher than anticipated for those attracted by the initial lower vehicle price. Tesla, notably, has disbanded its public relations department, making direct verification of such strategic motives challenging.

This unconventional approach by Tesla represents a significant shift from its historical practices. Previously, the company had not removed core Autopilot functionalities from its vehicles post-launch to encourage upgrades. This current decision has led to skepticism among consumers and critics, who question the value proposition of purchasing a vehicle with deliberately limited features only to incur additional costs for essential software. The financial implications of this strategy are particularly scrutinized, especially when considering the competitive landscape of electric vehicles, where other manufacturers offer robust standard features at similar or lower price points.

The underlying motive for Tesla's decision could stem from the challenging economics of producing lower-cost electric vehicles, an issue echoed by other manufacturers in the industry. By leveraging software sales, which typically boast high profit margins, Tesla might be aiming to improve the profitability of its Standard trims or guide consumers towards its more expensive Premium models. The success of this strategy hinges on whether buyers prioritize advanced software functionalities enough to absorb the additional cost, or if the perceived compromise in standard features will deter them from these otherwise more accessible Tesla options.

The Evolving Landscape of Automotive Features: A Double-Edged Sword

This situation with Tesla’s Autopilot highlights a fascinating, albeit contentious, trend in the automotive industry: the increasing monetization of software features. While offering more affordable base models can broaden market access, deliberately stripping down essential functionalities to push premium upgrades risks alienating a segment of buyers. From a consumer perspective, the expectation is often that core safety and convenience features, once associated with a brand's identity (like Autopilot for Tesla), should be standard across the board, or at least clearly differentiated in pricing and features from the outset. This move could be seen as a gamble, potentially boosting software revenue but at the cost of brand perception and customer satisfaction for those seeking a complete package without hidden upgrade costs. It prompts a critical discussion about what constitutes a 'complete' vehicle experience in the age of advanced driver-assistance systems and how automakers balance accessibility with profitability.

See More

Ford Adjusts F-150 Lightning Pricing and Enhances Range Following EV Credit Expiry

Ford is strategically repricing its F-150 Lightning electric truck by as much as $4,000 and simultaneously extending its driving range. This adjustment comes in response to the cessation of the $7,500 federal electric vehicle tax credit, aiming to sustain the vehicle's market appeal and competitive edge against rivals such as the Tesla Cybertruck.

Ford F-150 Lightning Undergoes Strategic Repricing and Range Enhancements for 2026 Model Year

In a significant market maneuver, Ford has announced a series of price adjustments and range improvements for its 2026 F-150 Lightning electric pickup. Effective October 13, 2025, the automotive giant is cutting prices by up to $4,000 on certain trims, specifically reducing the Flash trim by $4,000 and the Lariat by $2,000. This move is primarily a response to the expiration of the $7,500 federal EV tax credit at the close of September, a development anticipated to affect consumer demand across the electric vehicle sector. According to Ford spokesperson Martin Günsberg, this strategy aims to offset the loss of the federal incentive and maintain the F-150 Lightning's sales momentum.

The adjustments come at a crucial time, following a period where the F-150 Lightning temporarily ceded its leading position as America's best-selling electric pickup to the Tesla Cybertruck. However, Ford quickly reclaimed its lead in 2025, selling over 10,000 Lightnings in the third quarter, nearly double the approximately 5,400 Cybertrucks sold by Tesla. By September, Ford's year-to-date electric pickup sales surpassed 23,000 units, significantly outperforming Tesla's 16,097 Cybertrucks sold, which marked a 38% decrease compared to the previous year, as reported by Cox Automotive.

A notable update for the 2026 model year is the introduction of a new base STX trim, replacing the XLT. Priced at $63,345, the 2026 F-150 Lightning STX offers an impressive 290 miles of EPA-estimated range, a substantial increase of 50 miles over the 2025 XLT's 240-mile range, achieved with a 123 kWh extended range battery compared to the XLT's 98 kWh battery. Furthermore, Ford has integrated several off-road enhancements, including running boards from the Tremor series and new wheel designs, bolstering the STX's appeal.

Beyond the STX, the 2026 F-150 Lightning Flash will now start at $65,995, down from $69,995. The Lariat and Platinum trims are set to begin at $74,995 and $84,995, respectively. While Ford has opted not to proceed with a program to independently extend the $7,500 EV tax credit, the company is rolling out attractive incentives. These include potential savings of up to $11,500 in California and other Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) states for the 2025 F-150 Lighting STX, comprising a $9,000 lease cash bonus and an additional $2,000 Ford Power Promise cash bonus. Nationwide, Ford is offering 0% APR financing for 72 months, coupled with a $2,000 Power Promise bonus, making current models highly accessible to a broader consumer base.

This strategic realignment by Ford underscores the dynamic and competitive nature of the electric vehicle market. By adjusting prices and enhancing vehicle capabilities, Ford is demonstrating its commitment to maintaining leadership in the electric pickup segment, ensuring that the F-150 Lightning remains an appealing option despite changes in federal incentives. This proactive approach not only benefits consumers through improved value and performance but also sets a precedent for how automakers might navigate future shifts in EV policy and market dynamics.

See More