For decades, Smart's identity has been intrinsically linked to its diminutive, egg-shaped city car, a vehicle universally recognized despite its formal names, City Coupe or Fortwo. This compact, rear-engined two-seater served as the brand's cornerstone from its inception in 1997, solidifying its place as a unique offering in urban transportation. The association was so profound that "Smart Car" became a common descriptor, highlighting the vehicle's iconic status and its deep integration into the public consciousness.
In 2024, the original Smart car ceased production, marking a transition point for the company. Under new co-ownership between Geely and Mercedes, Smart diversified its portfolio, venturing into the electric vehicle market with larger, more generalized EV crossovers. These new models, surprisingly powerful for the brand's history, represented a departure from the compact design ethos that had previously been Smart's hallmark.
The coming year will witness Smart's decisive return to its heritage with an all-electric two-seater city car, meticulously designed to echo the spirit of its renowned predecessor. Adopting Smart's contemporary naming convention, this new vehicle will be known as the #2, signifying a fresh chapter while honoring its roots. This strategic move underscores the brand's commitment to urban-centric mobility solutions in the electric era.
The aesthetic development of the #2 is being spearheaded by Mercedes's design team, while manufacturing operations are based in China, overseen by Geely. Despite its global production footprint, Europe remains a pivotal market for the #2. Dirk Adelmann, Smart's European CEO, has emphasized the significance of this project, stating that the #2 will usher in a new era of personal urban transportation, particularly in iconic Smart cities such as Rome, London, and Paris.
Initial glimpses of the #2, revealed through shadowy teaser images, suggest a design that embraces the conventional two-box profile of the third-generation Fortwo, diverging from the distinctive sloped front of its earlier iterations. It is anticipated that the #2 will incorporate design elements from Smart's newer, larger models, including sleek LED lightbars that seamlessly connect the front and rear illumination. The full unveiling of the #2 is scheduled for the upcoming year, forming part of Smart's ambitious plan to launch three new electric vehicles within the next three years, potentially reigniting hopes for a new Roadster model as well.
The automotive landscape is witnessing a notable transformation, exemplified by Volvo's recent decision to discontinue the V90 luxury wagon. This move, which follows earlier speculation, confirms the V90's production halt by the end of the current month, marking the end of an era for this esteemed model without a direct replacement in sight. This shift reflects a broader industry trend where sport utility vehicles (SUVs) are increasingly eclipsing traditional wagon body styles in consumer popularity, prompting manufacturers like Volvo to re-evaluate their portfolios.
Volvo's leadership has been candid about the challenges facing wagons, with the CEO suggesting that the smaller V60 wagon might also face a similar fate in due course. Despite the historical appeal and practicality of wagons, their market share has dwindled as buyers migrate towards SUVs, which are often perceived to offer advantages such as easier entry and exit and more convenient cargo loading, despite potentially being heavier, less fuel-efficient, and more costly. Meanwhile, the S90 sedan, the V90's counterpart, will persist in certain Asian markets, notably China, while being globally succeeded by the electric ES90, a five-door liftback, further emphasizing the industry's pivot towards electrification and varied body types. Even the resurgence of the 'XC70' moniker for a rugged Volvo model surprisingly materializes as an SUV, not a wagon, solidifying this trend. Volvo posits that its XC60 SUV might be repositioned to cater to the segment traditionally served by wagons.
While the discontinuation of the V90 is a somber note for wagon aficionados, it highlights the dynamic nature of the automotive market, where consumer demand dictates product evolution. The prevailing popularity of SUVs, often fueled by marketing and perceived benefits, continues to reshape vehicle offerings. This transition, while challenging for some traditional segments, simultaneously opens avenues for innovation and adaptation within the industry, fostering a continuous cycle of change and progress. It serves as a reminder that industries, like societies, must evolve and adapt to new preferences and demands, turning challenges into opportunities for growth and innovation.
Selling a used vehicle can often feel like a complex journey, fraught with frustrating negotiations, questionable buyers, and endless administrative burdens. However, the emergence of online platforms has transformed this landscape, promising a streamlined, more convenient alternative. This article delves into a firsthand account of selling a car through such a digital service, examining both its efficiencies and unexpected challenges.
A recent transaction involving an online car sales platform has shed light on the realities of this modern approach. A seller's experience, which included an initial online valuation, a physical inspection that led to a price adjustment, and the rapid receipt of funds, offers valuable insights. This case study, supported by broader consumer feedback, underscores the evolving dynamics of the automotive resale market, where digital convenience often comes with its own set of considerations.
The journey began with an online appraisal for a 2019 Toyota 4Runner, which, despite its mileage, received an appealing initial offer of nearly $18,000. Opting for a direct drop-off at a local vending machine location, the seller anticipated a swift and seamless handover. This choice reflected a desire for efficiency over a scheduled pickup, aligning with the platform's promise of convenience.
However, the on-site inspection diverged from expectations. While some previous users reported minimal scrutiny, this instance involved a thorough examination, leading to the discovery of a minor seat imperfection. This detail, overlooked during the online quote, resulted in a $400 deduction from the initial offer. Although a minor adjustment, it prevented immediate check issuance, necessitating a direct deposit. Despite this, the funds were received remarkably quickly, often within hours, showcasing the platform's underlying payment efficiency, even when minor issues arise during the physical assessment.
The individual's experience resonates with a broader narrative of online car sales, revealing a spectrum of consumer satisfaction. Many users echoed the sentiment of ease and competitive pricing, often receiving valuations superior to traditional dealerships. The strong resale value of certain brands, like Toyota, further contributed to positive outcomes for some sellers, reaffirming the financial benefits offered by these platforms.
Conversely, not all transactions were without complications. Some sellers reported significant price reductions after physical inspections, particularly when vehicles deviated from their online descriptions, illustrating the importance of accurate initial disclosures. While the overall sentiment leaned towards recommending these services for selling, there remains a cautionary note regarding their buying experience, suggesting that the industry's digital evolution is still a work in progress. This nuanced feedback highlights the need for continued transparency and consistent service delivery across all aspects of the online car market.