Cars

Porsche to Retain Volume Knobs in Future Vehicles

This article explores Porsche's decision to maintain physical volume knobs in its vehicles, even as automotive interiors increasingly feature large touchscreens. It highlights the importance of tactile controls for drivers and how this design philosophy is influencing other manufacturers, such as BMW.

Preserving the Tactile: Why Physical Knobs Endure in Modern Car Interiors

The Shift Towards Digital Cockpits and its Challenges

In the evolving landscape of automotive interior design, many manufacturers have embraced a minimalist approach, often replacing traditional buttons and switches with expansive touchscreens and touch-sensitive interfaces. Porsche, for instance, initially adopted this trend with its electric Taycan model, significantly reducing the number of physical controls.

Porsche's Recommitment to Tangible Controls

However, Porsche appears to be reevaluating this strategy. Dirk Assfalg, the electronics manager for the Cayenne, indicated in an interview that consumer preferences still strongly favor physical buttons. This feedback is particularly evident in the new Cayenne Electric, which, despite boasting a sophisticated 14.3-inch OLED central display, consciously integrates tactile controls for crucial functions. Porsche explicitly states that essential physical controls, such as the volume knob, will remain a permanent feature in their models. Key functions like fan speed and temperature adjustments also retain their dedicated physical interfaces.

Insights from Customer Preferences

Assfalg emphasized that strong demand from customers, particularly those in markets like China, underscores the desire for physical buttons. He noted that drivers appreciate and seek the tangible feedback provided by these controls, especially for frequently used operations.

Broader Industry Trends: BMW's Approach to Physical Controls

Porsche is not alone in recognizing the enduring value of physical controls. BMW, for example, also continues to equip its vehicles, including the electric iX3 SUV with its large 17.9-inch iDrive display, with a physical volume rocker. BMW's research, which analyzed data from approximately 10 million drivers, revealed that the volume knob remains one of the most frequently utilized features across its diverse vehicle lineup. This collective industry experience suggests that while digital interfaces offer advanced functionalities, the immediate and intuitive nature of physical controls remains indispensable for the driving experience.

The Future of In-Car Controls: A Balance of Digital and Analog

The persistence of the volume knob in modern high-tech vehicles from leading manufacturers like Porsche and BMW signals a balanced approach to interior design. It indicates that despite the rapid technological advancements and the proliferation of touchscreens, the fundamental need for accessible and intuitive physical controls continues to shape automotive innovation, ensuring a user-friendly experience for drivers.

Tesla Reintroduces Turn Signal Stalks for Model 3 Amidst User Discontent

Tesla, a pioneer in automotive innovation, introduced a significant alteration in the refreshed Model 3 \"Highland\" during late 2023: the omission of the traditional turn signal stalk. This design decision, aimed at achieving a more streamlined and futuristic interior by relocating turn signal controls to haptic buttons on the steering wheel, sparked considerable debate among drivers. While it aligned with the company's minimalist aesthetic, many users found the new interface less user-friendly, particularly in situations requiring quick or precise signaling without extensive steering wheel rotation.

Responding to user feedback and practicality concerns, Tesla has now made available a retrofit kit to reintroduce the conventional turn signal stalk in the Model 3. Priced at $595, this accessory allows owners to revert to a more familiar and, for many, more intuitive control system. The installation process requires the vehicle to be linked to a Tesla account and is carried out at official Tesla Service Centers, involving the replacement of the steering wheel and column. This move follows a similar decision in the Chinese market, where customer dissent prompted Tesla to offer a comparable kit, priced at approximately $349, underscoring a global recognition of the preference for tactile controls.

Interestingly, this re-evaluation of design choices wasn't extended to the new Model Y \"Juniper,\" launched earlier this year in the US, which retained its physical turn signal stalk. This disparity suggests an acknowledgment within Tesla that certain conventional controls offer superior functionality for everyday driving. The introduction of the retrofit kit, therefore, marks a pivot from an overly minimalist approach, indicating a willingness to adapt to customer needs and driving practicality, even if it means charging a premium for the reinstatement of a previously removed feature. This evolution demonstrates the complex interplay between advanced design and fundamental user experience in the rapidly changing automotive landscape.

In the pursuit of innovation and progress, it is crucial to remember that true advancement often lies in finding a harmonious balance between cutting-edge technology and human-centric design. While bold steps are necessary to push boundaries, listening to the collective experience of users and adapting with humility can lead to products that are not only revolutionary but also genuinely enhance daily life. This iterative process of innovation, feedback, and refinement ultimately shapes a more intuitive and empowering future for all.

See More

Tesla Model Y Recalled for Reverse Light Malfunction

Tesla, a prominent leader in electric vehicle innovation, has recently announced a recall affecting certain Model Y units manufactured in the first half of 2025. The reason for this recall is a surprisingly fundamental issue: malfunctioning reverse lights. This discovery, made during routine end-of-production testing at the Tesla Gigafactory Berlin, has led to a voluntary recall impacting approximately 260 vehicles. While the defect itself appears minor, it highlights the importance of even the most basic safety features in modern automobiles, regardless of their advanced technological capabilities.

Details of the Tesla Model Y Reverse Light Recall

On October 9, 2025, Tesla officially announced a recall for specific Model Y vehicles after an investigation revealed a fault in their reverse lights. The issue was initially identified on July 13, 2025, during a quality control check at the Tesla Gigafactory in Berlin, Germany. During this inspection, a Model Y's reverse light failed to activate as expected. Following this discovery, Tesla engineers launched a thorough investigation from July 14 to September 22, 2025, to pinpoint the cause and determine the extent of the problem. It was found that a simple manufacturing defect, such as a loosely connected wiring harness or a faulty batch of lights, could be responsible for the malfunction. These reverse lights are a mandatory safety component, regulated by standards such as the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 108 in the US. The recall specifically targets Model Y vehicles produced between February 6 and July 26, 2025. Owners of these vehicles are advised to take their cars to a local Tesla service center. The inspection and repair process is estimated to take around 20 minutes, involving the examination of the rear reverse lights and fascia harness, with replacements made as needed. This situation underscores that even for a company at the forefront of electric vehicle technology, fundamental hardware issues can still necessitate traditional physical repairs.

This recall, while addressing a relatively minor component, serves as a stark reminder that even the most technologically advanced vehicles are not immune to basic manufacturing defects. For a company like Tesla, renowned for its cutting-edge innovations and long-range electric capabilities, a recall for faulty reverse lights might seem like an embarrassing oversight. It prompts reflection on the rigorousness of quality control processes, especially for seemingly simple yet crucial safety features. This incident underscores that the pursuit of technological advancement must always be balanced with meticulous attention to every detail, ensuring that even the most basic functionalities meet stringent safety and quality standards.

See More