Racing

NASCAR TV Ratings: Clash with NFL and NCAA Impacts Viewership

Recent NASCAR television viewership figures present a complex picture, particularly as the sport contends with the immense popularity of the National Football League and NCAA football. The opening weekend of the NFL season saw record-breaking viewership, with CBS and FOX attracting tens of millions of viewers, posing a significant challenge for other sports broadcasts. This intense competition directly impacted the NASCAR Cup Series race at World Wide Technology Raceway, leading to a notable decline in its ratings.

The NASCAR Cup Series event held at World Wide Technology Raceway registered a 0.82 rating and drew 1.525 million viewers on USA Network. This figure represents a considerable decrease compared to the 1.8 million viewers who tuned in for last year's playoff race at Watkins Glen. The concurrent NFL broadcasts, which achieved 23.9 million viewers on CBS and 17.9 million on FOX, established new viewership highs for both networks, making it difficult for NASCAR to capture a larger audience share.

In contrast, the NASCAR Xfinity Series race, also held at 'Gateway' and broadcast on the CW Network, demonstrated a positive trend in its season-long viewership. Despite facing competition from college football, which likely served as a lead-in and lead-out for the race, the Xfinity Series attracted 989,000 viewers. This marks only the second race of the season not impacted by weather conditions that failed to surpass the one-million-viewer mark, indicating a generally robust performance throughout the year. Last week's race in Portland, which took place late at night on the west coast and also competed with college football, drew 733,000 viewers.

Further analysis provided by a network executive highlighted positive audience trends for NASCAR despite the stiff competition. Compared to the same weekend race in Atlanta last year, the audience was up by 23%. Additionally, viewership saw a 9% increase when compared to the 26th race of the previous year from Bristol. The broadcast of the World Wide Technology Raceway race reached its peak viewership between 9:45 PM and 10:00 PM ET, with 1,160,000 viewers tuning in during that fifteen-minute window.

These figures underscore the dynamic landscape of sports broadcasting, where concurrent major events can significantly influence audience distribution. While the NASCAR Cup Series experienced a dip in viewership when directly competing with football giants, the Xfinity Series' consistent performance suggests a dedicated audience base and effective scheduling strategies.

Bristol Night Race: Tire Management Takes Center Stage

The highly anticipated Bristol Night Race is expected to be a test of tire management, a departure from the unpredictable conditions of the past. Goodyear, the official tire supplier, has developed a softer right-side compound, prompting teams to adapt their strategies for optimal performance on the track.

Anticipated Tire Challenges and Strategic Responses at Bristol

The Bristol Motor Speedway will once again host a thrilling NASCAR Cup Series event, where the focus is set to shift towards tire conservation. Goodyear's NASCAR project manager, Mark Keto, has unveiled a new, softer right-side tire compound for this race, a direct response to the unusually rapid tire degradation observed in the 2024 spring event. That earlier race saw unprecedented lead changes and passes, largely attributed to cold temperatures and a less abrasive track surface.

Keto expressed confidence that the new compound, while untested in race conditions due to a prior MLB event at the venue, is designed to enhance tread wear as the track accumulates rubber, thus reducing the typical fall-off in performance. He acknowledges that the goal is to achieve tire wear within a 70-lap window, a more aggressive target than the 120-150 laps seen previously. This approach aims to bring back the strategic element of tire management that was highly valued in the spring race.

Drivers and teams are bracing for the implications. Denny Hamlin recently highlighted a severe shredding incident during a simulation test with the new tire, underscoring the potential for extreme wear. However, Keto clarified that such tests don't fully replicate real-world track dynamics, including temperature and rubber buildup.

Meanwhile, 2020 Cup Series champion Chase Elliott of Hendrick Motorsports stated his team is preparing for a 'normal' Bristol race, emphasizing readiness to adjust on the fly should tire conservation become critical. Rudy Fugle, crew chief for the No. 24 car, echoed this sentiment, noting the challenge of optimizing camber settings to prolong tire life without sacrificing performance if conditions allow for less wear. Ross Chastain, a playoff contender, trusts Goodyear's expertise and anticipates that practice sessions will be crucial for understanding the new tire's behavior under race conditions.

The upcoming Bristol Night Race presents an intriguing challenge for teams and drivers, pushing them to balance aggressive racing with meticulous tire management. The outcome will not only determine the race winner but also offer valuable insights into the future of tire development in NASCAR.

See More

FIA to Review Sainz's Dutch GP Penalty Following Williams' Appeal

Formula 1 stewards will convene virtually on September 12th to consider an appeal lodged by the Williams team regarding a penalty imposed on their driver, Carlos Sainz, during the recent Dutch Grand Prix. This hearing is a response to Williams's request for a 'right of review' of the 10-second penalty Sainz received following a collision with Racing Bulls driver Liam Lawson at Turn 1 of the Zandvoort circuit. Williams believes new, significant evidence has emerged that was not available to the stewards at the time of their initial ruling, which they hope will lead to a reversal of the decision.

The incident in question occurred at the Dutch Grand Prix, where Carlos Sainz and Liam Lawson made contact, resulting in Sainz being penalized. Sainz expressed strong disagreement with the decision, prompting his team, Williams, to initiate the formal review process. Their primary objective in pursuing this review is to gain a clearer understanding of the racing guidelines and their application, hoping for an outcome that will provide better clarity for future competitive scenarios.

The review process is structured in two distinct phases. The initial phase, scheduled for Friday, September 12th, will focus exclusively on the admissibility of the new evidence presented by Williams. For this evidence to be accepted, it must meet stringent criteria: it must be demonstrably significant, directly relevant to the incident, and crucially, it must not have been available to the stewards when they made their original decision. If these conditions are satisfied, the proceedings will then advance to a second phase, where the incident itself will be re-evaluated based on the newly admitted information.

Despite Williams's efforts, the FIA's regulations stipulate that for a right of review to be granted, the new evidence must be something genuinely unforeseen. Given that the stewards had access to all necessary video footage and data at the time of the initial penalty, it remains uncertain whether Williams's appeal will be successful. However, this appeal underscores the ongoing debate within Formula 1 concerning racing guidelines, which continue to be a source of contention among drivers, even being a central topic of discussion at a recent drivers' briefing during the Italian Grand Prix.

A key element of the current regulations, particularly relevant to this incident, is that a driver who is ahead at the apex of a corner, such as Lawson was in this case, is not obligated to provide space on the outside for a trailing competitor. This rule allows the leading driver to gradually widen their steering, effectively forcing the outside driver off the track. This interpretation of racing conduct has contributed significantly to the ongoing disagreements among drivers regarding fair play and the boundaries of aggressive maneuvering on the circuit.

See More