Racing

FIA Sets Date for Williams' Right of Review Hearing After F1 Dutch GP Penalty

Williams and Racing Bulls will attend a virtual hearing with FIA stewards on September 12 to discuss Carlos Sainz's penalty from the Dutch Grand Prix, raising questions about racing guidelines.

Justice on Track: Williams Seeks Review of Controversial F1 Penalty

FIA Schedules Virtual Review for Dutch GP Incident

The global governing body for motorsports, the FIA, has set a date for a virtual meeting with the Williams and Racing Bulls Formula 1 teams. The purpose of this assembly is to re-evaluate a penalty imposed on Carlos Sainz during the recent Dutch Grand Prix.

The Zandvoort Collision: Sainz vs. Lawson

Carlos Sainz, representing Williams, was involved in an on-track incident with Racing Bulls driver Liam Lawson at Turn 1 of the Zandvoort circuit. This collision resulted in a 10-second penalty for Sainz, a decision he and his team vehemently contested.

Williams' Push for a Right of Review

Following the race, Williams formally submitted a request for a "right of review" to the FIA. The team emphasized the importance of clarifying future racing conduct and expressed optimism for a favorable outcome, believing new evidence could alter the initial ruling.

The Review Process: Admissibility and Re-evaluation

The upcoming hearing on September 12 will unfold in two distinct phases. Initially, the stewards will assess whether Williams' right of review is admissible. For this, Williams must present compelling evidence that is both significant, relevant, and was not available during the initial decision-making process.

Uncertainty Looms Over the Outcome

Should the stewards deem the review admissible, a secondary session will be convened shortly thereafter to delve into the specifics of the incident. However, there is skepticism regarding the success of Williams' appeal, as the stewards had access to all necessary video footage when the original penalty was issued.

Debate Continues on F1 Racing Regulations

The controversy surrounding Sainz's penalty has reignited discussions about Formula 1's racing guidelines. These regulations continue to divide drivers and were a primary topic during a recent drivers' briefing at the Italian Grand Prix. A key point of contention is the rule that allowed Lawson to maintain his line, forcing Sainz off track, as Lawson was ahead at the corner's apex.

Christian Lundgaard Reflects on Debut Season with Arrow McLaren, Eyes 2026 Title Bid

Christian Lundgaard recently reflected on his first season competing with Arrow McLaren in the IndyCar Series, labeling it a triumph. Having transitioned from Rahal Letterman Lanigan Racing, where he secured three podium finishes including a victory, Lundgaard significantly elevated the performance of the No. 7 car by achieving six podiums and a fifth-place overall finish in the championship. This marks the most successful season for Arrow McLaren's No. 7 car since the team joined the series, underpinned by a remarkably strong start with three podiums in the initial four races, placing him second in the standings behind Alex Palou.

Despite a dip in results during the middle of the season, Lundgaard views this period as crucial for growth, emphasizing that these challenges provided invaluable lessons for both him and his team. He lauded Arrow McLaren's exceptional organization, cohesive personnel, and unified objectives, highlighting the collective belief that drives their pursuit of excellence. Lundgaard's commitment to mastering oval racing is a key focus, believing that consistent top-five finishes in these events will be pivotal for a championship bid in 2026. He expressed confidence in his and the team's continuous improvement, citing notable turnarounds in performance at challenging events like Thermal and Portland as evidence of their progress.

Lundgaard also shared insights into his collaboration with team boss Tony Kanaan and teammate Pato O'Ward, recognizing their unique contributions to his development. Kanaan's leadership and mentorship have been instrumental, offering a deep understanding of driver needs from an organizational perspective. While acknowledging O'Ward's distinct and highly effective oval racing style, Lundgaard remains focused on refining his own approach, seeking to blend different strategies to maximize performance. His offseason plans include maintaining a competitive edge through activities like golf, underscoring his dedication to constant self-improvement as he relentlessly pursues the IndyCar championship.

This journey highlights the power of perseverance and teamwork. In the face of adversity, true champions leverage every experience, good or bad, as a stepping stone towards future triumphs. Lundgaard's story is a testament to the fact that success is not merely about wins, but about continuous learning, unwavering dedication, and the collective spirit of a unified team.

See More

NASCAR to Address Post-Race Weight Tactic with Trackhouse Racing

NASCAR is poised to address a contentious issue with Trackhouse Racing regarding a unique post-race maneuver. During a recent event, drivers Ross Chastain and Shane Van Gisbergen were observed driving their vehicles onto the grass during the cool-down lap. This action has sparked speculation among officials that it was a calculated tactic to increase their cars' weight for the mandatory post-race inspection, a move that could significantly impact race integrity and fairness.

NASCAR Initiates Talks with Trackhouse Racing Over Driver Tactics and Pit Lane Rules

In a significant development for the NASCAR Cup Series, managing director Brad Moran announced on Tuesday, September 9, 2025, during an interview on SiriusXM NASCAR Radio, that a formal discussion would be held with Trackhouse Racing's management and crew chiefs. The focus of these discussions will be the controversial decision by drivers Ross Chastain and Shane Van Gisbergen to drive their Chevrolet vehicles onto the grassy areas during the cool-down lap of Sunday's race. This unusual action has raised concerns within NASCAR's competition department, as it could be interpreted as an attempt to illegally influence post-race weight inspections. Chastain and Van Gisbergen concluded the race in 24th and 25th positions, respectively, and were subject to inspection as playoff contenders, with their points standings just above and below the cutoff line. Moran emphasized that current rules could place teams in a precarious position and that clarifications would be issued to all teams, commencing with the Bristol event, to prevent similar incidents. Furthermore, the discussion will extend to the increasing trend of drivers utilizing teammates' or affiliates' pit stalls to address loose lug nuts before rejoining the track. While this practice currently incurs a 'pitting outside the pit box' penalty, fan sentiment suggests a desire for more severe consequences. However, Moran confirmed that, for now, the competition department deems the existing penalty adequate. The primary concern remains safety, particularly preventing loose tires on the track at high speeds, a risk mitigated by quick pit lane interventions, even if technically outside the designated box. NASCAR remains committed to prioritizing safety while continuously evaluating the effectiveness of its rules.

The incident involving the Trackhouse Racing drivers highlights the continuous evolution of competitive strategies in motorsport. While teams constantly seek to gain an edge, it is crucial for regulatory bodies like NASCAR to ensure that such strategies adhere to the spirit of fair play and maintain safety standards. This situation serves as a reminder that rules must be clear, consistently enforced, and adaptable to unforeseen tactics, fostering an environment of integrity and equal opportunity for all participants. The upcoming discussions and potential rule clarifications are vital steps towards upholding these principles in the competitive world of NASCAR.

See More