Cars

Lucid Air Critiques Lead to Company Improvements and Future Uncertainties

A well-known automotive YouTuber, Jason Fenske, recently brought to light significant dissatisfaction with his 2025 Lucid Air Touring, citing a range of software and hardware deficiencies. In an exemplary display of corporate responsiveness, Lucid Motors promptly addressed these criticisms, acknowledging its own shortcomings and detailing a comprehensive plan for product enhancement and customer satisfaction. The company committed to implementing various software patches and preparing a major user experience overhaul, UX 3.0, slated for release in the coming autumn. Furthermore, Lucid is actively developing solutions for hardware issues, such as a recalcitrant front trunk and a problematic cup holder design, with revised components expected in early 2026. This open dialogue between a critic and a manufacturer highlights the evolving landscape of electric vehicle development and the importance of direct feedback in driving innovation and quality improvements.

Lucid Motors Addresses Criticisms and Unveils Improvement Strategy

In a notable turn of events that unfolded in January 2026, Jason Fenske, the influential creator behind the YouTube channel “Engineering Explained,” publicly voiced his profound disappointment with his recently leased 2025 Lucid Air Touring. His candid review, which quickly garnered over a million views, detailed a litany of issues ranging from software glitches affecting plug-and-charge functionality and automatically activating heated seats for his dog, to mechanical flaws like a stiff cup holder and an unreliable front trunk. Fenske, who initially leased the vehicle due to his belief in Lucid's engineering prowess, found himself confronted with unexpected imperfections.

Lucid Motors, the California-based electric vehicle manufacturer, swiftly engaged with Fenske following his critique. The company openly admitted its current position was "not happy" and revealed an internal organizational restructuring that had occurred prior to Fenske's video. Lucid assured Fenske that significant efforts were underway to address the reported issues. In response, the automaker has already rolled out several software updates to rectify existing bugs and plans a major user experience enhancement, UX 3.0, scheduled for an early autumn release. Regarding hardware concerns, Lucid is actively designing a fix for the problematic front trunk and a revised cup holder, with the latter anticipated for production in the first half of 2026. However, Fenske's most significant unresolved concern pertains to the driver-profile system, which he believes lacks the intuitive profile-switching capabilities found in competitors like Tesla. Lucid clarified that its Android-based system presents more complex customization challenges compared to Tesla's Linux-based platform, suggesting this particular issue may not see an immediate resolution.

Despite Lucid's proactive measures, Fenske, with roughly two and a half years remaining on his lease, expressed ongoing skepticism. While acknowledging the company's efforts, he indicated a strong inclination to return the vehicle rather than continue with the lease, underscoring the high expectations consumers hold for luxury electric vehicles. This situation serves as a compelling case study in brand transparency and customer relations within the rapidly evolving automotive sector.

The proactive and transparent response from Lucid Motors to a prominent critic offers valuable insights into the dynamic relationship between automotive brands and their informed consumer base. It underscores the critical role of public feedback, especially from influential voices, in holding companies accountable and spurring genuine improvements. This incident also highlights the complexities involved in developing cutting-edge technology, particularly the challenges of integrating diverse software and hardware systems. Ultimately, Lucid's commitment to addressing its product's shortcomings, while not fully appeasing Fenske, demonstrates a commendable willingness to adapt and evolve in a competitive market. For consumers, this narrative reinforces the importance of thorough research and the power of collective voice in shaping product development and customer service standards.

Most Americans Still Prefer Gasoline-Powered Cars, Study Reveals

A recent analysis by Deloitte uncovers a surprising consumer trend: the majority of American car buyers are still choosing traditional gasoline vehicles over electric or hybrid alternatives. This preference is particularly pronounced in the U.S., where 61% of respondents indicated they would select an internal combustion engine for their next car. This figure significantly surpasses the 5% who would opt for an electric vehicle and the 21% considering a hybrid, challenging earlier expectations of a swift transition to electric mobility. This pattern is not unique to the U.S., with other regions like Southeast Asia and India also showing strong leanings towards gasoline vehicles, suggesting a broader reluctance to fully embrace electric options at present.

The primary factor influencing this enduring preference for gasoline cars appears to be economic. The rising costs associated with new vehicles, particularly electric models, are a major concern for consumers. A substantial 62% of Americans prioritize securing a favorable deal, while 47% value transparent pricing in their vehicle purchase decisions. Even among those open to electric vehicles, 52% are motivated by potential fuel cost savings, underscoring the importance of overall ownership costs. High upfront prices, limited driving range, and charging inconveniences are significant deterrents to electric vehicle adoption, prompting some major automotive manufacturers to re-evaluate their electrification timelines and continue supporting internal combustion engine development.

This consumer sentiment is also reflected in policy adjustments globally, with several European nations reconsidering or relaxing their timelines for banning combustion engines. The United Kingdom, for instance, has extended its ban from 2030 to 2035, and Germany has made concessions for synthetic fuels in gasoline cars. These shifts acknowledge the practical challenges and market realities that conflict with aggressive electrification mandates. In the U.S., legislation has been introduced to support the ongoing development of gasoline engines, including regulations that will permit these engines to meet efficiency standards for several more years. While the long-term vision may still be electric, current market dynamics suggest that gasoline-powered vehicles will remain dominant for the foreseeable future.

The automotive industry is in a dynamic phase, balancing innovation with consumer demands and economic realities. The sustained preference for gasoline cars in America and beyond underscores the importance of addressing the cost, convenience, and infrastructure challenges associated with electric vehicles. Moving forward, the industry must innovate to make sustainable transportation more accessible and appealing to a broader audience, ensuring a smoother and more equitable transition to a greener future.

See More

The Surging Trend of Off-Road Inspired Vehicles in Urban Environments

A fascinating paradox is unfolding in the automotive world: a growing segment of consumers are gravitating towards vehicles designed for rugged, adventurous terrain, yet primarily operate them within urban and suburban landscapes. This trend sees manufacturers introducing numerous off-road-inspired trims for small and mid-size SUVs and trucks, equipped with features like knobby tires and plastic-clad wheel wells, which evoke a sense of outdoor capability. However, most of these vehicles rarely venture beyond paved roads. The attraction appears to stem from a desire for the aesthetic of adventure, coupled with the practical advantages of enhanced durability and ride comfort in everyday driving conditions, rather than a genuine need for extreme off-road prowess.

The Rise of the "Soft-Roader": More Style Than Substance?

In recent years, a noticeable shift in consumer preference has led to a proliferation of vehicles sporting an "outdoorsy" aesthetic. From Honda TrailSports to Subaru Wilderness editions, the market is awash with models boasting rugged features. This phenomenon is vividly illustrated by the observation that parking lots often resemble national parks, filled with vehicles designed to look ready for adventure. While these models, often termed "off-road lite" or "soft-roaders," offer considerable capability, they typically lack the extreme hardware and ground clearance of dedicated off-road machines like the Jeep Wrangler Rubicon or Ford Bronco Raptor. Their primary purpose, it seems, is to transport owners to the trailhead, not conquer the summit.

Despite the limited off-road engagement, the demand for these vehicles is undeniable. Subaru, for instance, reports that approximately one-fifth of its customers opt for the Wilderness trim. Honda's 2026 Passport saw a staggering 80 percent of its sales attributed to the TrailSport model. Even luxury brands like Porsche and Lamborghini have embraced this trend, releasing lifted versions of their iconic 911 and Huracán, which quickly sold out. This widespread adoption suggests that the allure extends beyond pure utility.

Industry experts, such as Ed Kim, president and automotive analyst at AutoPacific, highlight the psychological aspect of this trend. Kim notes that while most buyers of family crossovers have no intention of tackling the Rubicon Trail, they are deeply attracted to the "imagery" associated with off-road vehicles. Market research supports this, indicating that 28 percent of SUV buyers and nearly half of truck buyers are willing to pay more for an off-road appearance package. John Marshall, owner of Coyote Land Tours in Moab, Utah, humorously points out that many simply buy these vehicles because "they're cute," drawn to their aggressive yet cheerful design cues, like raised ride heights, vibrant colors, and large tires.

Beyond aesthetics, there's a practical dimension to this trend. The robust features of off-road vehicles—such as higher ride heights, larger sidewalls, and standard all-wheel drive—offer tangible benefits in daily driving. These characteristics act as a counterpoint to urban driving challenges, providing a more forgiving ride over potholes and speed bumps, and greater resilience against minor impacts like curb strikes. Subaru's car line planning manager, Bill Stokes, acknowledges this, stating that while some buyers plan for occasional off-road excursions, many appreciate the softer suspension and added protection for navigating challenging city environments or deep snow. Vince Galante, Jeep's vice president of global design, adds that off-road vehicles often provide better visibility, feature easy-to-use physical switches, and sometimes offer removable roof or door panels, fostering a greater connection to the external world. This suggests a broader desire among consumers to escape the confines of overly sterile, screen-dominated vehicle interiors and embrace a more tactile and robust driving experience, even if that experience primarily unfolds on city streets.

This evolving automotive landscape reflects a deeper consumer desire for versatility, durability, and a connection to adventure, even when that adventure is merely metaphorical. The off-road aesthetic, with its promise of ruggedness and freedom, resonates powerfully with buyers seeking vehicles that can confidently handle both the demands of modern life and the occasional foray into the great outdoors.

See More