The Right to Equitable and Professional Auto Industry Repair (REPAIR) Act has been reintroduced in the U.S. Congress by Representative Neal Dunn, alongside co-sponsors from both parties. This legislation aims to empower vehicle owners and independent repair facilities with access to crucial repair data while maintaining stringent cybersecurity standards. The bill faced challenges in 2024 but has returned with improvements aimed at protecting the aftermarket industry. Concurrently, a new coalition has emerged to advocate for consumer rights over vehicle-generated data, highlighting the ongoing debate around automotive repair and data access.
On February 25, 2023, Representative Neal Dunn reintroduced the REPAIR Act, which previously encountered obstacles in October 2024 when it failed to advance past a House committee. The revised bill seeks to ensure that vehicle owners and their chosen repair facilities can maintain and repair vehicles under the same cybersecurity, intellectual property, and safety standards as those used by manufacturers' dealerships. Advocates argue that this will prevent automakers from monopolizing repair information and services, thereby promoting a competitive market for vehicle repairs.
Supporters of the REPAIR Act include organizations such as the Auto Care Association and MEMA Aftermarket Suppliers. Lisa Foshee, senior vice president of government affairs at the Auto Care Association, emphasized the importance of granting diagnostic tool manufacturers access to critical repair data. Additionally, the bill includes provisions to safeguard aftermarket suppliers from restrictions that could limit their ability to serve consumers. Paul McCarthy, president of MEMA Aftermarket Suppliers, noted that the core language remains unchanged but has been strengthened to better protect the industry.
A nationwide survey conducted by Hanover Research in April 2024 revealed significant challenges faced by independent repair facilities. More than 60% of respondents reported difficulties with routine repairs due to barriers imposed by original equipment manufacturers (OEMs). Consequently, over half of these facilities send up to five cars per month to dealerships because of data restrictions, leading to higher costs and inconvenience for drivers. Congressman Dunn stressed that American consumers should have full control over their vehicle repair and maintenance data to find the best service at reasonable prices.
In contrast, the SAFE Repair Act was proposed just a week before the reintroduction of the REPAIR Act. This alternative legislation, backed by organizations like the Automotive Service Association and Society of Collision Repair Specialists, seeks to codify an agreement made in 2023 that grants independent repair shops access to the same diagnostic and repair information available to authorized dealership networks. However, critics argue that the SAFE Repair Act does not address the broader issue of automaker control over vehicle data. Aaron Schulenburg, executive director of the Society of Collision Repair Specialists, pointed out that insurers are often the ones imposing restrictions on following OEM procedures, rather than the automakers themselves.
Meanwhile, the formation of the American Vehicle Owners Alliance (AVOA) on February 25 underscores the growing interest in policies that protect consumer property rights and foster competition in the automotive repair sector. Comprising eight founding members, including rental car companies and consumer advocacy groups, AVOA aims to work with Congress to ensure vehicle owners retain control over their vehicle data. While not explicitly endorsing either the REPAIR or SAFE Repair acts, AVOA Executive Director Richard Ward stated that the coalition will support legislation that ensures vehicle owners have access to and control of all their vehicle data.
The reintroduction of the REPAIR Act and the emergence of AVOA reflect the complex landscape of automotive repair legislation. Both initiatives aim to enhance consumer choice and protect the rights of vehicle owners while addressing concerns about data security and market competition. As these legislative efforts progress, they will likely continue to shape the future of the automotive repair industry and consumer access to repair data.
In a significant move for the automotive industry, key legislative groups have expressed their support for the reintroduction of the REPAIR Act into Congress. This bipartisan initiative aims to protect consumer rights and ensure fair access to vehicle repair information. The legislation addresses the growing concerns about monopolization of repair data by manufacturers, emphasizing the need for independent repair facilities to offer affordable and high-quality services. The bill's supporters argue that it will maintain the safety and operational efficiency of the nation’s 292 million registered vehicles, while opponents, primarily from the manufacturing sector, believe only licensed professionals should handle advanced vehicle systems.
On a recent Tuesday, a group of legislators introduced the REPAIR Act, championed by Representatives Neal Dunn (R-FL), Brendan Boyle (D-PA), Warren Davidson (R-OH), and Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D-WA). Alongside them were twelve other bipartisan members who joined forces to push this important legislation forward. The act seeks to safeguard vehicle owners' rights by ensuring they have access to essential repair and maintenance information. This measure is particularly crucial as modern vehicles become increasingly complex, incorporating advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), telematics, and software-driven diagnostics.
The introduction of this act comes at a time when there is a significant divide between consumers and manufacturers regarding access to vehicle data. Supporters highlight the importance of empowering vehicle owners with control over their repair and maintenance choices, ensuring they can find the best service at reasonable prices. Congressman Dunn emphasized that "American consumers deserve full control over their vehicle repair and maintenance data," adding that manufacturers have long withheld crucial maintenance information, limiting consumer choice.
Rep. Gluesenkamp Perez echoed similar sentiments, stating that Americans are tired of empty promises about lowering prices or respecting trades. She stressed the need for real agency in fixing personal property without reliance on disposable products. The act includes provisions for consumer choice, fair competition, cybersecurity, and safety protections, ensuring that independent repair shops can compete on a level playing field while maintaining vehicle safety and compliance with federal standards.
From a journalist's perspective, the reintroduction of the REPAIR Act marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate over consumer rights and industry practices. It underscores the importance of balancing innovation with accessibility, ensuring that technological advancements do not come at the cost of consumer autonomy. The legislation not only addresses immediate concerns but also sets a precedent for future regulations in the rapidly evolving automotive sector. As the debate continues, it remains to be seen how this act will shape the landscape of vehicle repair and maintenance in the coming years.