Cars

The BMW M2 CS: Almost Flawless, A Manual Transmission Away From Perfection

Enthusiasts often laud the BMW M2 as the quintessential contemporary M vehicle, primarily for its agile and compact form factor. The M2 Competition Sport (CS) variant amplifies this reputation, distinguishing itself as the sole rear-wheel-drive CS model until recently. While it may not boast the sheer power of the M3 CS and M4 CS, or the rapid acceleration to 60 mph offered by xDrive-equipped siblings, the M2 CS unequivocally earns its stripes as a serious performance machine, far from a mere 'entry-level' M car.

Under the hood, the M2 CS houses a formidable 3.0-liter S58 twin-turbocharged inline-six engine, meticulously tuned to unleash an impressive 523 horsepower and 479 lb-ft of torque—the highest output ever in an M2. Paired with an eight-speed automatic transmission, BMW states it can sprint from 0 to 60 mph in a blistering 3.7 seconds, a figure confirmed by independent testing. While its all-wheel-drive counterparts are known to achieve sub-three-second sprints, the M2 CS prioritizes a purist driving experience. The essence of a CS model lies in its enhanced lightness and track-focused design, surpassing standard M cars. The M2 CS sheds 97 pounds through extensive use of carbon fiber for components like the trunk, roof, mirrors, and forged alloy wheels, even extending to a carbon fiber center console for weight reduction.

Driving the M2 CS demands a dedicated approach, particularly when deactivating the xDrive system, which necessitates disabling dynamic stability control. On public roads, pushing its limits without contravening numerous regulations is a significant challenge. The M2 CS maintains a composed demeanor in its Comfort and Sport settings, which apply to the engine, chassis, steering, and brakes. However, activating Sport Plus, available for the engine and chassis, transforms the vehicle into an aggressively potent machine. Achieving the ideal setup for your driving style is paramount, and once calibrated, the M2 CS delivers exhilarating performance. Personalized settings can be stored for quick access via the M1 or M2 buttons on the steering wheel. Compared to standard M models, CS vehicles offer a more visceral experience: a more pronounced engine note, stiffer engine mounts, sharper throttle response, and more precise steering. This refined driving dynamic is a testament to BMW's responsive integration of enthusiast feedback, culminating in a driving sensation that genuinely elevates the M car experience.

In the realm of high-performance vehicles, the demand for a manual transmission option continues to resonate deeply with driving aficionados. The recent introduction of the M3 CS Handschalter, an exclusive rear-wheel-drive, manual-equipped model for the North American market, underscores this sentiment. This vehicle perfectly encapsulates the Lightweight CS philosophy, delivering an even more unadulterated driving experience. Although its six-speed manual gearbox limits its output to 473 horsepower and 406 lb-ft, resulting in a slightly longer 0-60 mph time of 4.1 seconds (or 3.8 seconds with a one-foot rollout), the sheer joy of engaging with the gears compensates for any marginal speed difference. Given the intense market demand for manual CS cars, evidenced by significant dealer markups on the limited 800-900 units of the M3 CS Handschalter, BMW has a clear opportunity. By introducing an M2 CS Handschalter, BMW could satiate this demand, particularly considering that enthusiasts already regard the M2 platform as ideal for a CS variant due to its compact size. Furthermore, if BMW could reduce the M2 CS's price, similar to how the M3 CS Handschalter is more affordable than its predecessor, it would create room for desirable features like yellow daytime running lights (DRLs) and BMW Individual colors, previously offered on the M3 Handschalter. Such a move would create a near-perfect performance recipe, and failing to capitalize on this potential would be a missed opportunity for the brand to fully connect with its most passionate customers.

The Legacy of Qvale Mangusta: A Grand Tourer's Tale

The Qvale Mangusta, a distinctive Ford V-8 powered two-seater produced between 1999 and 2001, holds a unique place in automotive history. Conceived from the Bigua concept, its design, penned by Marcello Gandini with his signature canted rear wheel arches, sparked strong reactions upon its debut. Despite its polarizing aesthetics and the tumultuous partnership between San Francisco megadealer Kjell Qvale and the eccentric Alejandro de Tomaso, the Mangusta aimed to offer Italian exotica at a more accessible price point. Its limited production run of 284 units, coupled with a bulletproof Mustang Cobra engine and luxurious interior touches, contribute to its allure as a collectible grand tourer, celebrated by enthusiasts for its individuality and performance.

This article chronicles the journey of the Qvale Mangusta, from its controversial inception to its current status as a rare and sought-after classic. It highlights the design philosophies that shaped its distinctive form, the challenges faced during its development and production, and its impact on the niche market of Ford V-8-powered specialty cars. The Mangusta's story is a testament to the passion and ambition of its creators, offering a glimpse into a period of automotive experimentation and the enduring appeal of unique, low-volume vehicles.

The Birth of a Polarizing Design: Qvale Mangusta's Origins and Aesthetic

The Qvale Mangusta emerged from a complex lineage, tracing its roots to the Bigua concept and inheriting design cues from Marcello Gandini, a renowned automotive stylist. Introduced between 1999 and 2001, this two-seater captivated and divided opinions with its distinctive aesthetic, particularly the signature canted rear wheel arches. Its development involved a significant investment from San Francisco dealer Kjell Qvale, who envisioned a luxury sports car that would bridge the gap between exotic Italian design and the reliable performance of a Ford V-8 engine. This blend of international influences and bold design choices set the Mangusta apart from its contemporaries, contributing to its unique identity in the automotive landscape.

The Mangusta's design journey was marked by a compelling fusion of European flair and American engineering, aiming to deliver a compelling driving experience. The collaboration, though fraught with disagreements between Qvale and the flamboyant Alejandro de Tomaso, ultimately resulted in a vehicle that, despite its quirks, commanded attention. Critics and enthusiasts alike debated its visual appeal, with some praising its timeless style while others found it unconventional. Yet, it was this very polarization that cemented the Mangusta's status as a memorable and collectible automobile, reflecting a period when automotive design dared to challenge conventions and push boundaries.

Performance and Practicality: The Mangusta's Driving Experience and Legacy

The Qvale Mangusta, powered by a 320-horsepower 4.6-liter Mustang Cobra engine, offered a blend of robust performance and surprising practicality for an exotic car. Its "bulletproof" and easily serviceable drivetrain, coupled with a five-speed manual transmission, promised reliability and manageable repair costs. Despite some shared components with more common vehicles, such as the steering column and instrument panel, the Mangusta's interior exuded luxury with triple-stitched Connolly leather and brushed-aluminum accents. This focus on both performance and a degree of everyday usability helped position it as a grand tourer, distinct from pure sports cars, making it an intriguing option for discerning buyers seeking something unique.

Achieving 0 to 60 mph in 5.5 seconds, the Mangusta delivered a compliant ride, light steering, and nearly balanced handling, fulfilling its mission as a personal coupe. Priced around $80,000, it offered a substantial discount compared to other Italian luxury vehicles, providing an accessible entry into the world of exotic motoring. However, with only 284 units produced from the Modena factory, its exclusivity has become a primary draw. Today, the Qvale Mangusta is recognized for its unique character and limited availability, appealing to collectors and enthusiasts who appreciate its unconventional design, reliable performance, and its storied place in the history of niche automotive production.

See More

Cargo Showdown: Honda HR-V vs. Subaru Crosstrek

When evaluating subcompact crossovers, discerning the nuances of cargo space can be a crucial factor, subtly distinguishing one model from another. The Honda HR-V and Subaru Crosstrek represent two distinct philosophies within this segment; Honda prioritizes expansive interior volume and urban practicality, whereas Subaru focuses on robust all-weather traction and adventurous capabilities.

A detailed examination of their specifications reveals that while both vehicles are similarly priced, their core missions diverge significantly. The HR-V, with its 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine delivering 158 horsepower, offers a smooth yet unhurried driving experience, ideal for city and suburban commuting. Its composed handling and quiet cabin contribute to a refined ride that feels more akin to a tall hatchback. In contrast, the Crosstrek provides engine options, including a more potent 2.5-liter flat-four generating 182 horsepower, paired with standard symmetrical all-wheel drive. This setup, combined with its impressive 8.7 inches of ground clearance and X-Mode system, positions the Crosstrek as a more capable choice for light off-road excursions and challenging winter conditions. Although both vehicles prioritize efficiency, achieving fuel economy in the high 20s to around 30 mpg combined, the Crosstrek's larger engine option offers a noticeable boost in acceleration for highway driving.

The critical difference in cargo utility lies in the space available with the rear seats in use. The HR-V boasts 24.4 cubic feet behind the second row, a substantial advantage over the Crosstrek's 20.0 cubic feet. This additional four cubic feet in everyday configuration makes the HR-V considerably more practical for transporting groceries, luggage, or gear with passengers onboard. However, when the rear seats are folded flat, the maximum cargo capacities become remarkably similar: the HR-V offers 55.1 cubic feet, closely followed by the Crosstrek's 54.7 cubic feet. The HR-V also provides a slightly more spacious rear passenger compartment, while the Crosstrek's squarer rear design better accommodates bulky outdoor equipment. Ultimately, the choice hinges on individual priorities: the HR-V caters to those who value interior roominess and urban comfort, while the Crosstrek appeals to buyers seeking standard all-wheel drive and off-pavement readiness, demonstrating that a vehicle's value is best measured against its intended purpose and the lifestyle it supports.

See More