Cars

2003 Crossover Comparison Test: A Look Back at Early SUVs

In 2003, a significant evaluation took place in the automotive world, focusing on a new class of vehicles: the car-like SUV, often referred to as crossovers. During this period, prominent automotive publication Car and Driver embarked on a rigorous comparison of five key models, driving them through challenging winter landscapes to assess their capabilities and performance. The vehicles under scrutiny included the 2003 Buick Rendezvous, the 2003 Honda Pilot, the 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor, the 2003 Nissan Murano, and the 2003 Toyota Highlander, each representing a different approach to this emerging market segment.

This in-depth review provided valuable insights into how these early crossovers handled various driving conditions, particularly in snow. The testing highlighted the distinct characteristics of each model, from their engine performance and handling dynamics to their interior comfort and practicality. Photos from the original comparison vividly capture the vehicles in action, illustrating their designs and real-world utility during a time when consumers were just beginning to embrace the versatility of these car-based sport utility vehicles. The publication's thorough analysis helped to define the standards and expectations for what would become one of the most popular automotive categories globally.

Ultimately, the 2003 comparison test served as a crucial benchmark for the nascent crossover segment. It underscored the industry's rapid evolution and the growing consumer demand for vehicles that offered a blend of sedan-like comfort and SUV-like utility. The insights gained from this evaluation not only informed buyers but also influenced subsequent designs and technological advancements in the development of future crossover models, paving the way for the diverse and highly capable vehicles we see today.

This historical look back at the early days of crossovers reminds us of the constant innovation and adaptation within the automotive industry. It showcases how a rigorous comparison can shape the perception and development of new vehicle categories, leading to advancements that benefit consumers and redefine driving experiences. The continuous pursuit of excellence and responsiveness to market needs are what drive progress and deliver increasingly sophisticated and practical solutions for modern transportation.

In the realm of extreme adventure and luxury travel, the Hunter RMV Isuzu Predator XLE stands as a testament to unparalleled engineering and design. This Nevada-based company, Hunter RMV, specializes in crafting robust off-road recreational vehicles and expedition-ready trucks. Their newest offering, the Predator XLE, commands attention with its imposing stature and a price tag that reflects its formidable capabilities.

Hunter RMV Unveils the Isuzu Predator XLE: A Half-Million Dollar Off-Road Marvel

Minden, Nevada – Hunter RMV has officially introduced its latest creation, the Isuzu Predator XLE, an expedition vehicle designed to conquer the most challenging terrains while providing a luxurious living experience. This extraordinary vehicle features a spacious 22-foot habitat built upon a specialized Isuzu FTR chassis, which has undergone a comprehensive four-wheel-drive conversion. The Predator XLE is currently available for an asking price of $545,000.

Key specifications of the Predator XLE include massive 45-inch tires, ensuring exceptional ground clearance for traversing rugged landscapes. The vehicle is powered by a robust 6.7-liter Cummins turbodiesel engine, specifically tuned for commercial-grade performance, delivering 260 horsepower and 660 pound-feet of torque. This powertrain allows for an impressive range of up to 1000 miles, thanks to its 100-gallon fuel tank. Mechanical access is streamlined by a tilting cab design, making maintenance straightforward.

The 4x4 conversion of the Predator XLE includes a 17,000-pound capacity front axle equipped with a locking differential and a two-speed transfer case, further enhancing its off-road prowess. For those familiar with military-grade vehicles, similar Acela-based models from Hunter RMV, which originate from Stewart & Stevenson military trucks, feature 7.2-liter Caterpillar diesels and a convenient central tire inflation system. While the Predator XLE on an Isuzu chassis does not feature the same DEF tank setup as its military counterparts from the 1990s, its advanced design still prioritizes ruggedness and reliability.

Comfort and self-sufficiency are paramount in the Predator XLE. An innovative retractable landing, akin to a porch, deploys from beneath the entry door, providing easy access to the living quarters. The vehicle also integrates rooftop solar panels that generate over 1000 watts, feeding power directly to the onboard battery system, ensuring continuous energy supply even in remote locations. Climbing into the cab is a multi-step process, indicative of its elevated design. Although its top speed is approximately 70 mph, which is more than adequate for its intended use, the ride quality can be bouncy at the FTR's standard 90-psi tire pressure; however, for extended off-road excursions, deflating the tires is recommended to improve comfort and traction. Notably, one of the compartments in the rear of the vehicle is dedicated to a garage, highlighting its versatile utility.

The Predator XLE represents the pinnacle of expedition vehicles, offering a unique blend of extreme off-road capability and luxurious living amenities for the most discerning adventurers.

The emergence of vehicles like the Hunter RMV Isuzu Predator XLE marks a fascinating intersection of luxury and extreme utility. It challenges our perceptions of recreational travel, moving beyond traditional RVs to purpose-built machines capable of truly global exploration. This development inspires a re-evaluation of what’s possible in mobile living, pushing the boundaries of self-reliance and adventure. For those with the means and the adventurous spirit, such vehicles open up a world of possibilities, inviting us to consider a life less tethered to conventional roads and more connected to the wild, untamed corners of our planet. It’s a testament to human ingenuity and the enduring desire for exploration and independence.

See More

2003 Crossover SUV Showdown: Buick Rendezvous vs. Honda Pilot, Mitsubishi Endeavor, Nissan Murano, and Toyota Highlander

In this comprehensive analysis, we delve into a comparison of five prominent crossover SUVs from the year 2003. These vehicles, often dubbed as 'neither-nors' for their blend of car-like comfort and SUV utility, were put through extensive evaluations over a 600-mile journey across northern Michigan. The aim was to scrutinize their diverse personalities, performance capabilities, and practical attributes to determine their standing in a rapidly evolving automotive segment.

The segment of crossover vehicles, a nomenclature initially met with some confusion, represents a significant shift in automotive design. Unlike traditional body-on-frame SUVs, these models utilize unit-body construction, offering enhanced lightness and structural rigidity. This design choice makes them less suited for extreme off-road conditions but highly proficient for urban and suburban navigation, such as trips to shopping centers and grocery stores. While conventional SUVs typically feature two-speed transfer cases for low-range off-road capability, crossovers, usually derived from front-wheel-drive platforms, primarily engage front-wheel drive and can transfer power to the rear wheels when traction is compromised. Towing capacity also generally favors traditional SUVs, with most front-drive-based crossovers, including those in this comparison, capped at around 3500 pounds, although some models may have lower limits without specific towing packages.

Among the contenders, the 2003 Buick Rendezvous CXL Versatrak AWD, sharing its platform with a minivan, offered a spacious interior with optional third-row seating and premium features like heated seats and a head-up display. Despite its comfortable amenities and considerable cargo capacity, its performance was notably subpar. Equipped with a 3.4-liter pushrod V-6 engine, the Rendezvous was the slowest in acceleration tests, taking 10.6 seconds to reach 60 mph. Its all-wheel-drive system, while effective in snow, contributed to a perceived lack of directional stability, and its ride quality received criticism for being noisy and bumpy. Overall, it provided a pleasant experience in ideal conditions but struggled when pushed against its more agile competitors.

The Mitsubishi Endeavor Limited AWD, an all-new entrant in 2004, impressed with its robust chassis and lively dynamics, despite having the second-lowest horsepower among the group. Its 3.8-liter SOHC V-6 engine, producing 250 pound-feet of torque, allowed it to keep pace with higher-powered rivals in acceleration, reaching 60 mph in 7.7 seconds. The Endeavor also demonstrated superior braking, stopping from 70 mph in just 173 feet. Its interior was praised for its luxurious materials and feel. However, its full-time all-wheel-drive system proved treacherous on snowy roads, and its exterior styling drew mixed reactions. Despite its length, its cargo capacity was the smallest, and it lacked a third-row seat, leading some to deem it a technically proficient but ultimately impractical package.

The 2003 Toyota Highlander Limited V-6 AWD, built on a modified Camry platform, offered a smooth and comfortable car-like driving experience. It was praised for its intuitive controls and serene highway cruising. Its 3.0-liter DOHC V-6 engine provided competent performance, reaching 60 mph in 8.1 seconds, placing it in the middle of the pack. However, its Vehicle Skid Control (VSC) system, while maintaining stability, was criticized for overly intrusive intervention that could not be disabled, limiting its dynamic appeal. The Highlander's compact dimensions, while contributing to easy maneuverability, also restricted its utility compared to larger models. Its understated character polarized opinions, with some finding its lack of excitement a drawback.

The Nissan Murano SE AWD, with its distinctive styling and athletic handling, was a standout. Powered by a 3.5-liter DOHC V-6 engine delivering 245 horsepower through a continuously variable transmission, it achieved impressive acceleration times, hitting 60 mph in 7.5 seconds. The Murano's superior braking performance, stopping from 70 mph in just 166 feet, underscored its sporty credentials. Its all-wheel-drive system, based on a front-wheel-drive platform, included a locking function for enhanced traction. The interior featured supportive leather seats and legible black-on-orange instruments. Yet, its firm ride quality and interior noise on rough surfaces, along with some minor fit and finish issues, detracted from its overall appeal. While prioritizing driving enjoyment, its cargo and passenger capacities were not as generous as some competitors.

The Honda Pilot, recognized as a 2003 5Best Truck, emerged as the top performer in this comparison. Despite some dynamic shortcomings, such as below-average skidpad performance and the longest braking distance in the group (195 feet from 70 mph), its real-world driving behavior was commendable. Its 3.5-liter SOHC V-6 engine, paired with a smooth five-speed automatic transmission, provided respectable acceleration, reaching 60 mph in 7.6 seconds. The Pilot excelled in ride quality and stability on varied road surfaces. Derived from Honda's acclaimed Odyssey minivan, it inherited outstanding virtues of space and adaptability, offering three-row seating that comfortably accommodated multiple passengers, along with numerous storage options and child-seat anchors. Priced competitively, even with optional navigation, the Pilot offered an unbeatable combination of utility, build quality, and value.

Ultimately, the Honda Pilot secured its leading position by delivering a comprehensive package of competence, structural integrity, interior spaciousness, and overall versatility. Its family-centric design, featuring generous seating and adaptable storage, clearly catered to its target audience. While its performance figures weren't always class-leading, its balanced attributes, combined with a compelling price point, made it the most well-rounded and practical choice. This robust combination of features and value cemented its status as the superior option in this group of early 2000s crossover SUVs.

See More