The concept of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) has faced significant polarization due to its challenge against established power dynamics. Supporters argue that DEI initiatives aim to address historical exclusions and systemic barriers, while critics believe these efforts undermine merit-based decisions. This debate highlights the need for a more nuanced understanding of DEI's purpose and implementation. Experts emphasize that ineffective approaches have contributed to backlash, with some companies resorting to superficial measures like tokenistic hires. To move forward, there is an urgent call to involve everyone in shaping workplace cultures that value inclusivity and equity.
Felita Harris, co-founder of Raisefashion, points out that DEI challenges entrenched power structures by addressing structural barriers that have historically dictated access to opportunities. According to Harris, the misconception that DEI compensates for deficiencies ignores the reality that certain groups have been systematically excluded from competing on equal footing. These programs aim to correct centuries of inequity, yet they haven't been given enough time to make meaningful changes. The long-standing presence of systemic barriers underscores the importance of giving DEI initiatives sufficient time to achieve their goals.
Jamie Gill, founder of The Outsiders Perspective, notes that many organizations have approached DEI without clarity or technical rigor. Some companies have taken shortcuts, making superficial "diversity hires" that do little to develop genuine talent pipelines. Such practices not only harm individuals but also damage the cause itself. Instead of fostering genuine inclusion, these tokenistic efforts create a perception of reverse discrimination, pitting groups against each other in a zero-sum mentality. This approach has alienated many from historically privileged groups who feel marginalized by DEI conversations.
Daniel Peters, founder of Fashion Minority Report, suggests that DEI discussions should be reframed to include everyone in the conversation. By inviting more people to reflect on what they want from their workplace culture, DEI can become a shared responsibility. Peters emphasizes that at some point, everyone will find themselves in a vulnerable or underrepresented category, whether due to disability, healthcare access, ageism, or economic instability. When everyone feels included, DEI initiatives are more likely to remain a priority and enhance overall workforce culture.
To advance DEI efforts, some companies are renaming the function to terms like "people and culture" or "employee engagement." While this may help reduce tension surrounding the topic, experts agree that merely changing the name won't resolve underlying issues. The focus should be on fostering genuine inclusion and equity, ensuring that all employees benefit from improved pay, benefits, and well-being. Ultimately, when DEI becomes a collective effort, it stands a better chance of creating lasting positive change in the workplace.
In a significant move towards financial planning, several key officials from Wood County recently convened before the County Commission to present their budget requests for the upcoming fiscal year. Among the notable requests was a proposed 5% salary increase for employees across various departments. This meeting highlighted the ongoing challenges faced by county services, including staff shortages and rising operational costs.
On a crisp autumn morning, the Wood County Commission welcomed multiple department heads to discuss their financial needs for the 2025-26 fiscal year. Mike Shook, Director of the Wood County 911 Center, expressed concerns about employee retention, noting a high turnover rate with 26 departures over three years. Despite these challenges, he emphasized that no additional funds were requested beyond potential raises.
Sheriff Rick Woodyard presented a detailed plan that included a 5% raise for his staff, along with adjustments in software maintenance budgets. He also proposed reallocating funds within existing line items to enhance efficiency. A particular focus was placed on freeing up deputies for law enforcement duties by utilizing court officers for mental hygiene patients, addressing an increasing number of petitions since January.
Todd Nonamaker, Maintenance Supervisor, reported that his department was fully staffed and functioning smoothly. His team has been diligently working on relocating records from the old sheriff’s department building, ensuring proper storage and eventual disposal.
Celeste Ridgway, Circuit Clerk, echoed the call for a 5% raise while also discussing plans to modernize record management through increased scanning and digital backups. Her office is exploring advanced storage solutions to safeguard critical information.
Commission President Blair Couch addressed the potential demolition of the former Mid-Ohio Valley Health Department Building, estimating a cost of $300,000. He also discussed a realtor's interest in Campbell’s Plaza and the possibility of transferring or auctioning the property.
Fred Newberry, North Hills Recorder Treasurer, sought assistance for an access road project, requesting $20,000 from the county. The town had already allocated $25,000 but needed additional support to cover the total cost of $45,000. Newberry also mentioned transferring opioid settlement funds to the county due to restrictions on their use.
The discussions underscored the complex interplay between maintaining essential services and managing limited resources, highlighting the importance of collaborative efforts to meet community needs.
This meeting serves as a reminder of the delicate balance required in public administration. Each department's request reflects not only immediate financial needs but also long-term strategic goals. The emphasis on employee retention, technological upgrades, and infrastructure improvements demonstrates a commitment to enhancing service delivery and public safety. As the commission deliberates on these proposals, it will be crucial to prioritize initiatives that yield the greatest benefit for the community. The willingness to explore innovative solutions, such as reallocating funds and embracing digital transformation, signals a forward-thinking approach to governance in Wood County.