Xiaomi Auto has entered into a significant agreement with Hyperion Leasing (Tianjin), a subsidiary of China National Machinery Industry (Sinomach), to accelerate the export of electric vehicles to key international markets. This unexpected move marks a shift in Xiaomi’s strategy, which previously focused on domestic sales. The partnership aims to enhance Xiaomi's presence globally and capitalize on the growing demand for electric vehicles abroad. The collaboration involves exporting Xiaomi’s highly successful SU7 sedan and potentially other models, while leveraging Sinomach’s extensive global network and resources.
The collaboration between Xiaomi Auto and Hyperion Leasing (Tianjin) signifies a strategic pivot towards international markets. By partnering with a state-owned enterprise like Sinomach, Xiaomi gains access to established distribution channels and support networks. This alliance is expected to facilitate smoother entry into major global markets, where the demand for electric vehicles is rapidly increasing. The partnership also addresses logistical challenges such as maintenance and technical support for vehicles sold overseas.
Sinomach, with its vast experience and presence in over 170 countries, brings invaluable expertise to the table. Founded in 1997, this conglomerate has grown to encompass 40 subsidiaries and more than 200 overseas service agencies. The group’s extensive reach will undoubtedly play a crucial role in promoting Xiaomi’s electric vehicles internationally. Moreover, the collaboration could open doors to new markets, including Russia, where Sinomach already distributes other car brands like Oting and Rox Motor. While official confirmation is pending, there are indications that Xiaomi cars might soon be introduced to the Russian market through this partnership.
The Xiaomi SU7 sedan, currently available in China, has garnered significant attention due to its impressive performance and design. With cumulative sales reaching 139,487 units last year, the SU7 has proven to be a hit among consumers. However, the high demand has led to delivery times ranging from 5 to 8 months. To address this bottleneck, Xiaomi is expanding its production capabilities with the construction of the F2 plant. Once operational, this facility will not only reduce delivery times but also support the assembly of Xiaomi’s second model, the YU7 electric crossover.
The SU7 offers various configurations to cater to different consumer needs. The Standard variant comes with a rear-wheel-drive setup powered by a single 220 kW motor and a 73.6 kWh battery, providing a range of up to 700 km. The Pro version upgrades to a larger 94.3 kWh battery, extending the range to 830 km. For those seeking more power, the SU7 Max features a dual-motor setup with a combined output of 495 kW and an impressive 800 km range. Priced between 21,600 and 41,150 USD, the SU7 is available in ten vibrant colors, including the newly introduced Magenta shade. As Xiaomi looks to expand globally, the SU7’s success in China positions it well to attract international buyers.
In a significant development for the electric vehicle (EV) sector, drivers using public charging stations in the UK are set to pay an additional £85 million in tax this year due to unequal VAT rates. This disparity, where home electricity users pay 5% VAT while businesses, including EV charger operators, face a 20% rate, is causing concern among industry leaders and environmental advocates. By 2030, this extra cost could skyrocket to £315 million as EV adoption increases. The government's hesitation to address this issue may hinder the transition away from fossil fuels, despite its commitment to zero-emission vehicles (ZEV). Industry experts argue that equalizing VAT rates would boost demand for EVs and promote fairness between those with and without private driveways.
In the golden hues of autumn, the UK's push towards sustainable transportation faces a formidable challenge. According to data from Zapmap, a leading analytics firm, electric vehicle drivers relying on public chargers will incur an additional £85 million in VAT costs in 2025. This figure is projected to rise sharply by 2030, reaching £315 million as more consumers switch to electric vehicles under the government’s ZEV mandate. The disparity arises because residential electricity users benefit from a lower 5% VAT rate, while commercial entities, including public charging stations, must charge a higher 20% VAT.
This discrepancy has sparked debate within the automotive industry. Eurig Druce, managing director of Stellantis UK, warns of a potential two-tier system where individuals with driveways enjoy lower charging costs compared to those who rely on public infrastructure. Campaign groups like FairCharge have urged Treasury chief secretary Darren Jones to rectify this “pavement tax,” arguing that it stifles progress toward electrification. Quentin Willson, founder of the campaign and a former TV presenter, describes the unequal rates as a “bizarre and conspicuous policy omission” that hinders the country’s green transition.
The government, however, remains cautious about altering VAT rates for public charging. While acknowledging the importance of decarbonizing transport, officials are concerned about the fiscal implications as fuel duties decline with growing EV adoption. Despite this, industry insiders believe that reducing VAT on public charging would not only foster fairness but also accelerate EV uptake. Delvin Lane, CEO of InstaVolt, asserts that any VAT reduction would be passed directly to customers, promoting price parity between home and public charging options.
Matt Galvin, managing director of Polestar UK, emphasizes the urgency of addressing this issue to support private buyers and prevent unfair financial burdens on those without access to home chargers. As the debate continues, the need for balanced policies becomes increasingly apparent to ensure a fair and sustainable future for all drivers.
From a journalistic perspective, this situation highlights the complex interplay between fiscal policy and environmental goals. While the government aims to maintain fiscal stability, it must also consider the broader societal benefits of transitioning to cleaner energy sources. Addressing the VAT disparity could be a pivotal step in ensuring equitable access to sustainable transportation, ultimately benefiting both the environment and consumers.