Racing

Williams F1 Team Initiates Urgent Investigation Following Dual Disqualification at Singapore Grand Prix Qualifying

Williams Racing’s team principal, James Vowles, has announced a swift and thorough investigation into the disqualification of both Alex Albon and Carlos Sainz from the Singapore Grand Prix qualifying session. The decision by the FIA came after technical inspections revealed that the Drag Reduction System (DRS) on both cars exceeded the permissible 85mm limit, an outcome Vowles described as \"bitterly disappointing.\" He emphasized that the team had no intention of gaining an unfair advantage, and while their internal checks cleared the cars, the team accepts the FIA’s definitive ruling. This incident leaves Williams facing a significant challenge, with both drivers starting from the back of the grid, compelling the team to re-evaluate their operational protocols to avoid similar future issues, even as Mercedes' George Russell secured pole position and Red Bull's Max Verstappen claimed the second spot on the front row.

The double disqualification for Williams Racing at the Singapore Grand Prix qualifying has triggered an immediate internal inquiry by Team Principal James Vowles. Both Alex Albon and Carlos Sainz were found in breach of technical regulations concerning their Drag Reduction System (DRS), which was discovered to exceed the maximum allowed opening of 85mm. This unexpected setback, which Vowles characterized as profoundly disappointing, means both drivers will commence the main race from the rear of the grid. Despite the team's assertion that they were not seeking any performance advantage and that their own pre-qualifying checks had shown compliance, the FIA's stringent post-session scrutiny led to the definitive ruling. Williams now faces the daunting task of strategizing a recovery to score points from a disadvantaged starting position, alongside undertaking a comprehensive review of their technical and procedural checks to prevent any recurrence of such an infringement.

Immediate Repercussions of the Double Disqualification

The Williams Formula 1 team has initiated an urgent investigation following the disqualification of drivers Alex Albon and Carlos Sainz from the Singapore Grand Prix qualifying. This decision by the FIA was based on a technical non-compliance discovered during post-qualifying scrutineering: the Drag Reduction System (DRS) on both cars exceeded the maximum allowed opening of 85mm. Team Principal James Vowles expressed deep disappointment, clarifying that the team did not intend to gain any performance advantage and had passed their own internal checks. Despite this, Williams fully accepts the FIA's ruling. This critical infraction means both Albon and Sainz will start the upcoming Grand Prix from the very back of the grid, a significant blow to their hopes of securing points in the highly competitive race.

The disqualification of both Williams drivers, Alex Albon and Carlos Sainz, from the Singapore Grand Prix qualifying session stemmed from a critical technical oversight regarding the Drag Reduction System (DRS) on their cars. Following the qualifying runs, the FIA's routine scrutineering revealed that the adjustable rear wing elements, when deployed, surpassed the mandated 85mm maximum opening. This breach of technical regulations prompted an immediate and decisive disqualification. James Vowles, the team principal, publicly acknowledged the team's profound disappointment but accepted the FIA's verdict, emphasizing that there was no deliberate attempt to gain an unfair competitive edge. He confirmed that an urgent internal investigation is underway to understand how this regulatory lapse occurred, particularly given that the cars had cleared the team's own pre-session inspections. With both cars now relegated to the back of the grid, the team faces an uphill battle to salvage any points from the Singapore Grand Prix, highlighting the crucial need to refine their internal checking processes to avert similar incidents in the future and maintain adherence to Formula 1's strict technical guidelines.

Path Forward: Williams Racing's Strategy and Procedural Review

In the wake of the Singapore Grand Prix qualifying disqualifications, Williams Racing is now entirely focused on developing a robust strategy for the upcoming race. Starting from the rear of the grid, both Alex Albon and Carlos Sainz face an arduous challenge to advance through the field and secure valuable championship points. Team Principal James Vowles underscored the team's belief in their car's potential to perform well despite the setback. Beyond race day, a critical review of internal procedures will be conducted to ensure that such technical compliance failures are comprehensively addressed and prevented from recurring. The team is committed to thoroughly examining their inspection protocols to guarantee absolute adherence to FIA regulations in all future events.

Following the disappointing double disqualification at the Singapore Grand Prix, Williams Racing is confronted with a formidable task for the race ahead. With both Alex Albon and Carlos Sainz starting from the back, the team's primary focus shifts to an aggressive race strategy aimed at maximizing their potential to climb through the ranks and, ideally, secure points. James Vowles, the team principal, conveyed the team's determination to fight from this disadvantageous position, reiterating confidence in the car's inherent capabilities. Crucially, this incident has prompted an immediate and in-depth re-evaluation of Williams' entire technical and operational framework. The objective of this procedural review is to pinpoint the exact cause of the DRS infringement, refine inspection methodologies, and implement stricter quality control measures to ensure absolute compliance with all FIA technical regulations in the future. This proactive approach is vital for restoring team integrity and preventing any recurrence of such "bitterly disappointing" events, as Williams looks to move past this setback and continue its pursuit of competitive performance in Formula 1.

DeLeon Secures Back-to-Back BTCC Pole Positions at Brands Hatch

In a dramatic qualifying session at Brands Hatch, Daryl DeLeon, driving for West Surrey Racing in a BMW 330i M Sport, remarkably secured his second consecutive pole position in the British Touring Car Championship. This feat not only reinforces his standing in the Jack Sears Trophy contention but also intensifies the battle for the overall championship, as both leading title contenders, Tom Ingram and Ash Sutton, were surprisingly eliminated during Q2.

Qualifying Drama Unfolds at Brands Hatch Finale

The final qualifying round of the British Touring Car Championship at Brands Hatch Grand Prix Circuit on October 4, 2025, saw Daryl DeLeon emerge victorious, claiming his second successive pole position. DeLeon, piloting the West Surrey Racing BMW 330i M Sport, showcased exceptional skill, particularly after an initial pole-worthy lap was disallowed due to track limits. Undeterred, the Anglo-Filipino driver delivered a stellar performance to edge out Dan Cammish by a mere 0.023 seconds in the Q3 shootout.

However, the main drama unfolded earlier in Q2, where the two primary championship rivals, Tom Ingram of Excelr8 Motorsport and Ash Sutton of Alliance Racing, failed to advance. Ingram, whose Hyundai i30 N Fastback was hampered by a minimal one-second TOCA Turbo Boost, a penalty for his championship lead, found himself outpaced despite being just 0.126 seconds off DeLeon's Q2-leading time. Nevertheless, Ingram's performance secured him the prestigious Goodyear Wingfoot Award for consistent qualifying results throughout the season, effectively removing Dan Cammish from contention for that specific accolade. Sutton, in his NAPA Ford Focus ST, experienced a mysterious lack of grip on soft tyres during Q2, leading to his elimination. This places Ingram in seventh and Sutton in eleventh for Sunday's inaugural race, setting the stage for a fiercely contested championship showdown.

Behind DeLeon and Cammish, Dan Rowbottom, also from Alliance Racing, secured third place, just 0.033 seconds off pole. The top five was incredibly tight, with Tom Chilton (Team Vertu Hyundai) and Adam Morgan (Team Vertu Hyundai) completing the group, all within a tenth of a second of the pole sitter. Jake Hill, the reigning champion, made it to Q3 but opted for older tyres to preserve fresh ones for the races, finishing sixth. Charles Rainford and Gordon Shedden also delivered strong performances, showcasing the highly competitive nature of the BTCC.

The qualifying results highlight the unpredictable and thrilling essence of the BTCC, where even championship leaders can face unexpected challenges. DeLeon's repeat pole positions demonstrate his burgeoning talent and composure under pressure. For the title protagonists, Ingram and Sutton, their starting positions will undoubtedly make Sunday's races a test of strategic prowess and raw driving ability, promising an enthralling conclusion to the season. The narrow margins across the top drivers underscore the intense competition and the crucial role every millisecond plays in motorsport.

See More

Verstappen's Post-Qualifying Reflections: Navigating Singapore's Challenges and Norris's Influence

Max Verstappen of Red Bull Racing reflected on a challenging yet ultimately positive qualifying session at the Singapore Grand Prix. Despite securing a second-place grid position, a notable improvement on a high-downforce track for his team, Verstappen expressed some frustration with Lando Norris's actions during the final stages of Q3. He suggested that Norris's slow driving ahead of him created 'dirty air,' impacting his potential for pole position.

Verstappen highlighted that while he secured second on the grid, he believed pole position was within reach. During a media interaction, he mentioned observing the delta times on his steering wheel during his second Q3 lap, indicating the potential for a faster time. He stressed the critical nature of maintaining clear air in qualifying, especially on circuits like Marina Bay, where aerodynamic disturbances have a significant effect. Verstappen noted the unwritten rule among drivers to leave a substantial gap, ideally around eight seconds, to avoid disrupting competitors' laps.

Norris, in response to Verstappen's comments, reportedly dismissed the claims, suggesting that Red Bull frequently finds reasons to complain. Verstappen, however, found this reaction amusing, stating that he would likely offer a similar explanation if he were in Norris's position. When pressed on whether he intended to retaliate against Norris in future races, Verstappen's initial hesitation was followed by a definitive "Yes," referencing his team radio comment about remembering the incident.

The current discourse focusing on such minor on-track events underscores Red Bull's recent advancements. It indicates that Verstappen is once again a significant contender in the championship battle. Despite the competitive friction, Verstappen remains outwardly unconcerned with psychological tactics from rivals, choosing to concentrate on his own performance. He emphasized that the team's ability to be highly competitive on a circuit that typically presents greater challenges is what truly matters.

Verstappen acknowledged that while he would have preferred pole position, securing second place on a demanding track like Singapore is a very strong outcome for Red Bull. He underlined the team's competitive strength, which was evident in their performance during qualifying. His remarks highlight a blend of satisfaction with his team's progress and a competitive drive to overcome any perceived hindrances from fellow drivers.

See More