Electric Cars

A significant shift in the North American motorsport landscape is set to occur, as the NTT IndyCar Series has officially announced a new home for its Canadian street race. Beginning in 2026, the roar of IndyCar engines will echo through the streets of Markham, Ontario, marking an exciting new chapter for the prestigious racing series in Canada.

This relocation from Toronto's historic Exhibition Place, which has hosted IndyCar events since 1986, became necessary due to scheduling conflicts with the 2026 FIFA World Cup. Recognizing this challenge, race promoter Green Savoree Race Promotions, IndyCar, and the City of Markham collaboratively forged a multi-year partnership. This strategic move is not merely a temporary fix but a long-term commitment to bringing world-class motorsport to Markham. The newly designed 12-turn, 2.19-mile street circuit, crafted by renowned track architect Tony Cotman of NZR Consulting, will be located in Markham Centre, the city's vibrant downtown. This area, known for its rapid growth and accessibility via major highways and public transit, is poised to welcome over 140,000 attendees during the three-day race weekend, scheduled for August 14-16, 2026. City officials anticipate a substantial economic windfall from tourism, hospitality, and related services, solidifying the event's status as a major regional spectacle. Preparatory work is already in progress, highlighting the commitment of all parties involved to ensure a seamless transition and a spectacular debut for the Ontario Honda Dealers Indy at Markham.

This strategic relocation underscores the adaptability and forward-thinking nature of the IndyCar Series and its partners. By embracing a new venue in a dynamic community like Markham, the series is not only overcoming logistical hurdles but also fostering new opportunities for fan engagement and regional economic development. The move reflects a proactive approach to maintaining a strong connection with Canadian motorsport enthusiasts while injecting renewed energy into the racing calendar.

Formula 1's championship landscape could be dramatically altered if historical scoring methods were to be reinstated. Specifically, a return to the 1960s practice of dropping a driver's weakest results would redefine the battle for the title, aiming to mitigate the influence of unforeseen technical issues and unfortunate incidents. This retrospective examination highlights how such a rule might create a more equitable, albeit complex, competition, focusing on the purest driving performance throughout the season. The current system, where every point counts, often amplifies the impact of a single bad race, potentially overshadowing a driver's overall talent and consistency.

Consider the theoretical 2025 season, particularly the intense rivalry between McLaren teammates Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri. Under the existing regulations, Norris's recent retirement at Zandvoort severely hampers his championship aspirations, creating a significant 34-point deficit to Piastri. This scenario exemplifies how a single non-finish can disproportionately affect a driver's standing, irrespective of their preceding performances. The traditional dropped-scores system would offer Norris a lifeline, allowing him to discount such a result and remain a more potent contender.

Historically, this rule was a pragmatic response to the prevalence of technical failures in early Formula 1. During an era when mechanical reliability was far from guaranteed, drivers routinely faced the prospect of not finishing a race due to car issues. By permitting the exclusion of a few poor results, the system ensured that the championship truly reflected a driver's prowess over their best performances, rather than penalizing them for factors beyond their control. This approach fostered a championship where natural driving talent and strategic race management, unmarred by mechanical misfortune, were paramount.

The concept of "jokers"—races that could be dropped from a driver's final tally—evolved over time. Initially, in 1950, only the four best results from seven races were considered. This expanded to five or six, depending on the season's calendar. By 1967, the season was divided into two halves, with the worst result from each half being discarded. If this 1967 model were applied to today's extensive 24-race calendar, a DNF like Norris's in Canada would essentially be nullified, not affecting his overall points. For Piastri, it might mean sacrificing a minor points haul from an earlier race, though it wouldn't be as significant as Norris's DNF.

While the dropped-scores system introduced a layer of complexity to the championship standings, it was seen as a way to filter out the element of chance. The pivotal 1988 season, where Alain Prost amassed more overall points than Ayrton Senna but lost the title due to the "best 11" rule, ultimately led to the system's discontinuation. As car reliability improved, the rationale behind discarding results weakened, and a simpler, cumulative points system was adopted from 1991 onwards.

Despite its historical justification, reintroducing such a complex scoring method into modern Formula 1 presents challenges. The sport aims for simplicity and accessibility for new fans, who might find a non-cumulative points system unnecessarily convoluted. Unlike sports with straightforward scoring, F1's technical nature means unforeseen events can heavily influence outcomes. Yet, the debate persists: does the current system truly reward the most deserving driver, or does it sometimes punish factors beyond their control?

Ultimately, a championship defines its winner based on its established rules. While it's intriguing to speculate how historical systems might reshape contemporary battles, the essence of competition lies in excelling within the agreed-upon framework. F1's spectacle encompasses both human skill and the unpredictable technical elements, making every race a test of fortitude and adaptability within the prevailing regulations.