Electric Cars

This Saturday, the prestigious Belmont Stakes takes place at 7:04 p.m. ET in Saratoga Springs, New York. Traditionally held at Belmont Park in Elmont, this year's race shifts venues due to track renovations. The eight-horse lineup features Kentucky Derby victor Sovereignty and Preakness winner Journalism as top contenders. Industry expert Jared DeRossett provides insights into these favorites and other horses worth watching.

DeRossett highlights Journalism and Sovereignty as prime competitors with odds reflecting their strong performances in earlier races. While Journalism aims to recover from a challenging Preakness journey, Sovereignty enters well-rested. Additionally, DeRossett notes Rodriguez and Crudo as intriguing contenders for exotic bets, emphasizing Crudo’s impressive class jump and Rodriguez's potential lead battle dynamics. Advance wagering has seen Baeza gain early attention, though this may shift closer to race day.

Rivalry Renewed: Journalism vs. Sovereignty

At the heart of this year's Belmont Stakes lies an anticipated rematch between Journalism and Sovereignty. With respective morning line odds of 8-5 and 2-1, these two champions promise an intense showdown. Journalism, while recovering from a troubled Preakness run, is expected to avoid similar difficulties this time around. Meanwhile, Sovereignty brings renewed energy after ample rest, setting the stage for a thrilling contest.

Jared DeRossett anticipates that Journalism and Sovereignty will dominate pre-race betting discussions, with odds likely hovering near their initial values. Journalism’s previous performance suggests it might not trail as far back as during the Derby, potentially positioning itself better against Sovereignty. On the other hand, Sovereignty’s readiness for this clash could tip the scales slightly in its favor. As both horses vie for supremacy, fans eagerly await how these rivals measure up under Saratoga’s unique conditions.

Contenders Beyond the Favorites

Beyond Journalism and Sovereignty, several horses merit close observation. According to DeRossett, Rodriguez and Crudo stand out among potential dark horses. Crudo showcases remarkable progress following a decisive victory at Pimlico, indicating readiness for elevated competition. Similarly, Rodriguez's anticipated leadership role adds intrigue to the race dynamics, reminiscent of Gosger's strategic approach in the Preakness.

Further enhancing the field’s complexity, Baeza draws unexpected early interest despite being listed at 2-1. This surprising development reflects his solid third-place finish in the Derby and possible improvement in his second East Coast appearance. DeRossett emphasizes that while Journalism and Sovereignty anchor key betting strategies, incorporating Rodriguez, Crudo, or even Baeza into exotic wagers might yield significant rewards. As race day approaches, evolving odds will shape final betting decisions, ensuring excitement until the starting gate opens.

A resident of Howard County has successfully navigated a significant legal challenge, securing the right to pursue further authorization for a go-kart race track on his property. The Board of Appeals unanimously ruled in favor of Chris Siperko, determining that the race track falls within their jurisdiction. This decision clears the path for Siperko to reapply for a conditional use permit. Despite this victory, neighboring residents remain steadfast in their opposition and intend to continue their efforts against the track.

Siperko's journey began with a personal motivation: providing a practice venue for his son Achilles, who aspires to become a professional driver. Initially unaware of any restrictions, Siperko commenced construction in December 2023, believing he had fulfilled all necessary requirements. His consultations with a paving company reassured him that as long as the track did not interfere with public access, it was permissible without additional permits.

However, local complaints soon arose, prompting intervention from the Howard County Department of Planning and Zoning (DPZ). They cited non-compliance with county codes, which do not explicitly permit go-karting activities. According to existing regulations, conditional use permits are typically granted for facilities like athletic fields, swimming pools, tennis courts, and similar recreational areas. During a lengthy hearing before the four-member Board of Appeals, Siperko's attorney, Sang Oh, argued that the race track qualifies as an athletic field under broader interpretations of the code, despite its absence from the official list.

G. Macy Nelson, representing concerned neighbors, countered that adherence strictly to the code’s wording is essential. He emphasized that go-kart tracks are not included among permitted activities, aligning with DPZ's rationale. Nevertheless, the Board ultimately supported Siperko, criticizing DPZ for insufficient justification regarding the denial. Several board members expressed dissatisfaction with the lack of detailed reasoning provided by DPZ.

Nelson and his clients have vowed to persist in opposing the project. The next legal proceedings are scheduled for June 26, where the battle over the go-kart track will continue. This case underscores the complexities of zoning laws and the challenges faced by individuals seeking unconventional uses for their properties, highlighting the ongoing tension between personal freedoms and community standards.