Electric Cars

The True Cost of Tinting Your Tesla Cybertruck

A recent viral video showcasing the intricate process of applying window tint to a Tesla Cybertruck has sparked widespread discussion among enthusiasts and potential owners. This modern vehicle presents unique challenges for tinting services, leading to a broad spectrum of opinions on both the necessity and the financial implications of such modifications. The procedure, as depicted, is far from straightforward, raising questions about potential risks and the wide range of pricing currently observed in the market.

The Intricacies and Investment of Cybertruck Window Tinting

On September 9th, a TikTok user known as @therealunclemuuk brought the specialized craft of tinting a Cybertruck's impressive 61-inch windshield into the spotlight. This behind-the-scenes look quickly garnered over 25,600 views, igniting a conversation about the practicalities and expenses involved. The inherent design of the Cybertruck, coupled with varying state regulations on window tint levels (such as New York's 70% visible light transmission rule), means owners must carefully weigh their options.

The debate extends to the vehicle's manufacturing specifications, with some tinting professionals expressing reservations. Concerns have been voiced about the risk of water ingress during the tint application process, which could potentially compromise the Cybertruck's sensitive electronic systems and battery. Despite these warnings, numerous Cybertruck owners have successfully tinted their vehicles without incident, often emphasizing the importance of selecting a specialist with proven expertise in handling this particular model.

When it comes to the cost, there is no fixed rate. Prices fluctuate considerably based on factors like geographical location, the quality and type of tint film chosen, and the experience level of the installer. Discussions within online communities, such as the Cybertruck Owners Club, reveal a consensus among some professionals that a full ceramic tint, including the sunroof and windshield, should command a price upwards of $2,000, despite some initial estimates being lower. This variability underscores the evolving nature of the market for Cybertruck modifications, as specialists continue to refine their pricing structures to reflect the complexity and specialized labor involved.

The journey of personalizing a Tesla Cybertruck, especially with window tinting, is fraught with considerations. From navigating legal tinting limits to mitigating risks associated with the vehicle's electrical components, owners must proceed with informed decisions. The wide array of pricing and approaches currently available suggests a market still finding its footing, where careful selection of service providers and a clear understanding of the process are paramount to achieving desired aesthetic and functional outcomes without unforeseen complications. As the Cybertruck continues to gain popularity, clearer standards and more uniform pricing for such specialized services may eventually emerge, but for now, it remains a bespoke and often costly endeavor.

Tesla Recalls Powerwall 2 Units Due to Fire Hazard

Tesla has announced a significant recall affecting its Powerwall 2 home battery systems. Units produced from November 2020 to June 2022 have been identified as posing a potential fire hazard due to faulty battery cells. The company has moved to remotely discharge most of these units to mitigate immediate risks, while committing to replace them at no cost to the owners. This measure follows reports of overheating, smoke, and minor property damage, though no personal injuries have been reported. The recall currently focuses on units sold in Australia, but the international nature of Powerwall distribution raises questions about a broader recall.

Tesla Initiates Recall for Powerwall 2 Batteries Amidst Overheating Concerns

In a recent development, Tesla has issued a recall for specific Powerwall 2 home energy storage systems. The affected units, sold between November 2020 and June 2022, have been flagged due to a risk of battery cells overheating and potentially igniting. This action was prompted by multiple reports of Powerwall 2 units emitting smoke or flames, leading to minor property damage. While Tesla has not reported any injuries, the company has taken proactive steps to address the safety concern.

As part of the recall protocol, Tesla has remotely discharged the majority of the at-risk Powerwall 2 units. This measure significantly reduces the immediate danger of overheating. Owners of these home battery systems are advised to check their Tesla app to determine if their unit is affected; if so, it is likely already in a discharged state. Tesla has pledged to replace all recalled Powerwall 2 units with new ones at no charge to the customers. Furthermore, the company is evaluating the possibility of compensating individuals for any financial losses incurred, such as lost revenue from the inoperability of their Powerwall or increased utility expenses.

While the initial recall notice has been disseminated in Australia, the global distribution of Tesla's Powerwall units, all manufactured in Nevada, USA, suggests that the issue may not be confined to a single market. The notice itself acknowledges international sales, indicating that similar problems could emerge elsewhere. This situation highlights the complexities of managing product recalls for globally distributed energy technology and the importance of swift, decisive action to ensure consumer safety and maintain brand trust.

This recall serves as a crucial reminder for consumers to stay informed about product safety notices, particularly for sophisticated energy systems. It underscores the responsibility of manufacturers to rigorously test and monitor their products throughout their lifecycle. For Tesla, this incident is an opportunity to reinforce its commitment to safety and customer support, ensuring that this temporary setback does not diminish confidence in its innovative energy solutions. The transparency and responsiveness demonstrated in addressing this issue will be key to upholding its reputation in the rapidly evolving clean energy sector.

See More

Ford's Job Cuts in Germany Linked to EV Market Challenges

Ford has recently unveiled plans to reduce its workforce by an additional 1,000 positions at its electric vehicle manufacturing facility in Cologne, Germany. This decision is attributed to a perceived slowdown in the European electric vehicle market, impacting the company's production strategy. This latest announcement adds to a broader restructuring initiative by Ford, which aims to cut approximately 4,000 jobs across Europe by the year 2027, primarily affecting operations in Germany and the UK. The company intends to shift its Cologne plant from a two-shift to a single-shift operation starting in January, in response to these market dynamics. This development follows a period of significant investment by Ford in upgrading the Cologne facility for EV production and a notable worker strike earlier this year.

Ford's announcement on Thursday detailed the 1,000 additional job reductions at its Cologne plant, with the company specifically citing that electric vehicle demand in Europe has not met initial industry projections. The immediate consequence of this assessment is the operational change at the Cologne plant, which will transition to a single-shift production model by January. This latest round of job cuts will bring the total number of reductions in Ford's European workforce to approximately 5,000, representing about 14% of its regional employees, with Germany and the UK being the most affected countries in this strategic overhaul. These actions follow a period earlier this year when a worker strike at the Cologne facility temporarily halted production, underscoring the ongoing challenges faced by the automotive giant in its European operations.

Despite Ford's assertions of weakening EV demand, current statistics from the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association (ACEA) present a more complex picture. For instance, the first seven months of 2025 saw over one million battery electric vehicle (BEV) registrations in the European Union, marking substantial growth in key markets like Spain, Germany, and Italy. This data suggests that while the overall EV market in Europe is expanding, Ford may be encountering specific competitive pressures. The company is currently producing electric models such as the Explorer and Capri in Cologne, but it faces increasing competition from Asian manufacturers like BYD, known for their cost-effective EV offerings. These market shifts could be influencing Ford's sales performance and, consequently, its operational decisions.

Further analysis of registration data from the German Federal Motor Transport Authority (KBA) indicates that Ford registered 10,924 BEVs in Germany through August, constituting less than 15% of its total vehicle sales in the country. This performance is particularly notable given Ford's significant investment of nearly €2 billion (approximately $2.4 billion) into upgrading its Cologne plant for electric vehicle manufacturing. The company has also introduced the Puma Gen-E, an electric variant of its top-selling European model, which was the first EV to qualify for a substantial discount under the UK's Electric Car Grant program. These efforts highlight Ford's commitment to the EV market, yet the sales figures suggest a disparity between investment and market penetration, prompting the recent workforce adjustments.

The recent decision by Ford to implement further job cuts at its Cologne electric vehicle plant underscores the complex and rapidly evolving nature of the automotive industry's transition to electric mobility. While the company points to a softening of EV demand in Europe as the primary driver for these actions, broader market data suggests that the European EV sector continues to grow robustly. This discrepancy highlights potential internal challenges at Ford, possibly related to product competitiveness or market strategy, as it navigates a landscape increasingly shaped by fierce competition from both established players and emerging Asian manufacturers. The company's significant investments in its European EV production capabilities and specific model launches like the Puma Gen-E have yet to translate into the anticipated market share, leading to these difficult decisions regarding its workforce.

See More