Top and Bottom Cities for Driving in the United States

A personal finance platform has evaluated 100 American cities to determine which are most and least favorable for drivers. The assessment was based on a comprehensive scoring system that included vehicle ownership costs, traffic conditions, safety measures, and accessibility of automotive services. This analysis provides insights into how urban environments impact the driving experience.
Evaluating Reno and Las Vegas: A Comparative Analysis
Among the cities analyzed, both Reno and Las Vegas received mid-range rankings. Reno secured the 35th position overall, with notable strengths in safety but challenges in vehicle ownership expenses and maintenance access. Meanwhile, Las Vegas ranked slightly lower at 36th, excelling in traffic management and infrastructure but lagging in safety metrics.
Reno's performance varied across different categories. It scored relatively poorly in terms of vehicle ownership costs, ranking 66th. However, it performed admirably in safety, coming in at an impressive 11th place. Traffic and infrastructure were also decent, placing 27th. Conversely, access to vehicles and maintenance services was another weak point, landing at 68th. Las Vegas, on the other hand, had a more balanced profile. While it ranked 60th in vehicle ownership costs, its traffic and infrastructure were among the best, at 15th. Safety was less stellar, at 49th, but it still outperformed many cities in access to vehicles and maintenance, securing the 16th spot.
Best and Worst Cities for Drivers: Insights from the Study
The study revealed stark contrasts between the top and bottom cities for driving. North Carolina's Raleigh emerged as the leading city, followed by Boise in Idaho and Corpus Christi in Texas. These locations offer superior driving experiences due to well-maintained roads, efficient traffic systems, and robust safety protocols. In contrast, cities like Oakland, Philadelphia, and San Francisco faced significant challenges, ranking among the worst.
At the pinnacle of the list, Raleigh stood out for its excellent balance across all criteria. Boise and Corpus Christi also impressed with their low vehicle ownership costs and high safety standards. On the opposite end, Oakland struggled with heavy traffic congestion and poor infrastructure, while Philadelphia and San Francisco faced similar issues compounded by higher accident rates. The data sources included various government agencies, private organizations, and proprietary research, ensuring a thorough evaluation of each city's driving environment.