Australia's electric vehicle market is currently facing a significant legal challenge as Tesla Motors Australia has been accused of making exaggerated claims about its Model 3 and Y vehicles. The class-action lawsuit, filed in the Federal Court, alleges that Tesla overstated the battery life and self-driving capabilities of these popular models. Rebecca Jancauskas, director of JGA Saddler, the law firm behind the lawsuit, expressed concerns about the discrepancies between Tesla's promises and the actual performance of their cars. This case highlights issues such as "phantom braking" and failure to meet advertised range and autonomous driving features, affecting a substantial portion of Australian EV buyers.
Central to the lawsuit are three major allegations against Tesla. First, the company is accused of exaggerating the battery range of its vehicles. Many owners report that their cars never reach the advertised 75% of the promised range. Second, Tesla's "full self-driving" feature has not materialized as expected, despite customers paying a premium for this technology. Lastly, the phenomenon known as "phantom braking," where the car suddenly engages emergency brakes while in cruise control or Autopilot modes, poses a significant safety risk. Ms. Jancauskas emphasized the potential dangers of this issue, which could lead to serious accidents and injuries.
The impact of these alleged shortcomings extends beyond mere inconvenience. For many Tesla drivers in Australia, these issues have become a daily reality. The lawsuit seeks to hold Tesla accountable for failing to address these problems over several years. Despite being aware of these defects, Tesla allegedly continued to market its vehicles with inflated claims without offering compensation to affected consumers. The legal action underscores the importance of transparency and reliability in the rapidly growing electric vehicle market.
In addition to the Australian litigation, Tesla has faced scrutiny from US officials and has issued multiple recalls in recent years. In 2024 alone, the company recalled nearly 700,000 vehicles in the US due to tyre-pressure warning system issues and approximately 1.85 million vehicles because of software failures. So far in 2025, Tesla has already conducted two major recalls affecting hundreds of thousands of vehicles for power steering and rear-view camera problems. The financial backing of Woodford on a "no win, no fee" basis adds further weight to the Australian class action, indicating the seriousness of the allegations and the potential for significant compensation if successful.
The lawsuit aims to ensure that all electric vehicle manufacturers adhere to truthful marketing practices and deliver on their promises. It also highlights the need for greater accountability in ensuring that products are both safe and reliable. As the electric vehicle market continues to expand, consumer trust and satisfaction will be crucial for the industry's long-term success.
The United States government has initiated a policy change that will see the removal of electric vehicle (EV) charging stations from all federal properties. This decision, announced by President Trump, affects hundreds of charging points used primarily by federal employees. The administration deems these facilities as non-essential to its core operations. The General Services Administration (GSA), responsible for managing federal infrastructure and vehicles, will oversee this transition. The agency is also planning to retire the electric fleet acquired under the previous administration.
This shift in policy aligns with the current administration's broader stance on energy priorities. It reflects a move away from initiatives aimed at promoting sustainable transportation and green energy. Analysts suggest that the elimination of public EV infrastructure could have strategic implications, particularly favoring established players in the electric vehicle market. Moreover, critics argue that the outdated and often unreliable charging technology previously available did not effectively serve federal employees. Some view this reduction as part of a larger strategy to promote fossil fuels within the national energy framework, contrasting sharply with efforts by other regions, such as the EU, which are expanding their EV infrastructure.
The discontinuation of funding for electromobility underscores a significant policy divergence. While the Inflation Reduction Act had previously allocated substantial resources for transitioning to green energy, including billions for public charging networks, the new directive signals a retreat from these commitments. Despite concerns raised by environmental advocates, the administration remains focused on reorienting energy policies toward traditional sources. Ultimately, this move highlights the ongoing debate over the future of transportation and energy policy in the United States.
China's leading electric vehicle manufacturer, BYD, has unveiled its latest advanced driver-assistance system (ADAS), branded as "God’s Eye." This innovative technology will be standard across 21 of BYD's 30 models, spanning four brands. The system ranges from basic to premium tiers and includes features like adaptive cruise control, automated braking, and valet parking assistance. Despite the ambitious name, industry experts caution that it may not live up to its divine moniker. The integration of this technology could shake up the competitive Chinese EV market, where BYD already holds a significant share, and pose challenges for global players like Tesla and traditional automakers.
BYD's new ADAS system, God’s Eye, is set to revolutionize the driving experience by offering three distinct levels of assistance across various vehicle models. Even BYD's most affordable model, the Seagull hatchback, will come equipped with the base level of this technology at no additional cost. On the other end of the spectrum, the luxurious Yangwang U9 supercar will feature the top-tier version. This move underscores BYD's commitment to making advanced safety features accessible to all segments of the market.
The God’s Eye system relies on an array of cameras, sensors, and powerful onboard computers to assist drivers with tasks such as adaptive cruising, automated braking, and even learning user driving habits. While marketed as a comprehensive solution, the system is classified as L2+ ADAS, which still requires human supervision. During its launch event, BYD showcased the capabilities of the U9 supercar performing impressive maneuvers autonomously, but critics argue that this demonstration may have been exaggerated. Industry commentator Mark Rainford suggests that competitors like Huawei and XPeng offer more robust systems, highlighting the competitive nature of the Chinese EV market.
The introduction of God’s Eye as a standard feature in BYD vehicles is likely to impact smaller rivals and international automakers operating in China. BYD's dominance in the Chinese EV market, with a 27% market share, contrasts sharply with Tesla's declining presence. Tesla, which has yet to receive approval for its Full Self-Driving (FSD) technology in China, faces increased pressure from BYD's advancements. Traditional automakers like Toyota, VW, and Nissan may also struggle to compete against BYD's technologically superior offerings.
Despite the hype surrounding God’s Eye, some experts express concerns about the potential risks associated with over-reliance on ADAS systems. Professor Peter Norton warns that the use of divine terminology could lead to a false sense of security among drivers. He emphasizes the importance of educating users about the limitations of these technologies. Moreover, the competitive landscape in China is rapidly evolving, with companies like XPeng, Nio, and Li Auto pushing towards Level 3 autonomous driving systems. BYD's strategic investments in mapping data, cloud computing, and AI are crucial to maintaining its competitive edge. The company's shares surged following the announcement of God’s Eye, reflecting investor confidence in BYD's technological prowess and market positioning.