Retail

San Francisco Baklava Bakery Owner Navigates Challenges Amidst AI Boom

Tolgay Karabulut, the owner of BaklavaStory, a pastry shop in San Francisco, shares the ongoing challenges of operating a small enterprise within a city where the artificial intelligence sector's affluence significantly impacts the economic landscape. Despite his profound dedication to crafting baklava, the substantial expenses associated with labor and the escalating cost of living are making it difficult to maintain profitability. This situation leads him to frequently ponder the enduring feasibility of his business. Nevertheless, the positive feedback and appreciation from his customers provide immense satisfaction, motivating him to persist despite the financial pressures.

The Daily Grind of a Baklava Entrepreneur

Tolgay Karabulut, a 43-year-old entrepreneur and founder of BaklavaStory, meticulously manages his San Francisco bakery, where he dedicates himself to producing traditional baklava. His daily routine begins before dawn, around 5:40 a.m., six days a week. Accompanied by a single staff member, he starts preparing the delicate filo dough and other ingredients. By 8:00 a.m., the rest of his seven-person team arrives, and they work together to assemble the trays. The first batch of freshly baked baklava is usually ready by 9:15 a.m., just before the bakery opens its doors to customers at 9:30 a.m. Karabulut takes pride in using only the finest hand-picked pistachios imported from Turkey, ensuring that each pastry maintains its exceptional quality and freshness throughout the day. He bakes small batches every 20 minutes to guarantee customers always receive warm, fresh treats from his compact 100-square-foot kitchen. After his staff leaves at 2:00 p.m., Karabulut continues the baking process alone until the bakery closes at 6:00 p.m., often returning home exhausted but fulfilled by his passion.

Karabulut's commitment to quality is evident in his insistence on using premium ingredients, particularly the hand-picked pistachios sourced directly from Turkey, which he believes are essential for authentic baklava. This dedication to superior ingredients, coupled with his labor-intensive, artisanal production methods, distinguishes BaklavaStory in a competitive market. The small size of his kitchen, approximately 100 square feet, necessitates a precise and efficient workflow to manage the continuous baking cycle. Each day, around 50 to 60 trays of baklava are prepared and baked, a testament to the team's hard work. Karabulut’s willingness to personally continue baking after his staff departs underscores his deep involvement and passion for the business, and it is a strategic decision driven by the high operational costs in San Francisco. This daily routine, while demanding, allows him to maintain the high standards that define his bakery and to directly engage with the craft he loves.

Navigating Economic Realities in an AI-Driven City

Running a small business in San Francisco, particularly in the current economic climate, presents significant financial hurdles for Tolgay Karabulut. Despite his baklava bakery's success in attracting customers, the high cost of labor in California is his largest expense, as all his baklava is handmade. His personal income, approximately $40,000 last year, reflects the tight margins of his operation. This modest earning makes the city's exorbitant cost of living, exacerbated by the influx of wealth from the booming AI industry, particularly challenging. Karabulut shares a rent-controlled apartment in Nob Hill, paying around $1,300 monthly for his half, including utilities, yet he still struggles to afford a one-bedroom apartment due to soaring housing prices. He observes the stark contrast with employees in AI companies, who often earn salaries of $200,000 to $300,000, making rent a minor concern for them while it remains a significant burden for local business owners like himself.

The financial disparity between traditional small businesses and the flourishing AI sector in San Francisco creates an uneven playing field. Karabulut's struggle to afford a one-bedroom apartment, despite making a decent income for many other cities, highlights the severe affordability crisis in San Francisco. He dedicates most of his time to his bakery, often only returning home to sleep, indicating that his priority is the growth and sustainability of his business rather than an elaborate living situation. He dreams of expanding his operations, acquiring a larger kitchen to increase production, and ultimately securing a more comfortable living arrangement. However, these aspirations are tempered by the immediate financial pressures and the challenging economic environment. Despite these difficulties, the direct appreciation and positive reactions from his customers provide a powerful source of motivation, making the daily grind worthwhile and reinforcing his passion for his craft. He finds immense joy in seeing customers' delight and even sharing tips on how to best enjoy his baklava, solidifying his belief in the value of his business.

The AI Debate in Education: A Tale of Two Parent Groups

The integration of artificial intelligence into educational settings has sparked a contentious debate among parents, particularly in New York City. This report delves into the opposing viewpoints of parent groups who have actively engaged with the Mamdani administration regarding the role of AI in their children's schooling, culminating in a significant policy decision.

Navigating the Digital Divide: Parents' Battle Over AI in Schools

Unforeseen AI Integration and Parental Outcry

Craig Garrett, a Brooklyn-based book editor, expressed profound dismay upon discovering his five-year-old daughter was regularly interacting with an AI chatbot at school. He described his reaction as "horrified, shocked, and disappointed," finding the concept of a young child engaging with an animated AI character as a friend to be "deeply wrong." This revelation, made during a school district meeting in May of the previous year, ignited a wave of concern among parents, prompting Garrett to join the AI Moratorium (AIM) coalition, a group vehemently opposed to AI in classrooms.

The Dueling Perspectives on AI in Education

While the AIM coalition voiced strong objections, their concerns represent only one side of the coin. Another significant segment of parents believes that equipping students with AI literacy is crucial for their future success in an increasingly tech-driven job market. Keri Rodrigues, President of the National Parents Union, highlighted the exponential rise in job postings requiring AI skills, underscoring the urgency for students to learn this technology. These divergent views led to a sustained lobbying effort targeting the Mamdani administration, which ultimately sided with the anti-AI faction, at least for the immediate future.

Mamdani's Moratorium: A Temporary Pause

In response to the intense parental lobbying, Mayor Zohran Mamdani announced a one-year moratorium on student-facing AI platforms for elementary and middle school students in New York City public schools. This policy means that programs like Amira, which Garrett's daughter used, will have their AI features disabled. A spokesperson for New York City Public Schools emphasized that this decision was a result of extensive engagement with various stakeholders, including educators, parents, and experts.

Victory for Concerned Parents, Lingering Questions for Proponents

The AIM coalition celebrated the moratorium as a significant victory, despite it being shorter than their requested two-year ban. Members articulated feelings of being caught off guard by the widespread use of AI in classrooms and voiced anxieties about data privacy and the potential for chatbots to diminish the role of human teachers. Liat Olenick, a leader of the AIM group, recounted numerous instances of parents expressing shock and bewilderment, noting that the issue "struck a nerve" within the community. Olenick credits the group's persistent lobbying, including meetings with Chancellor Kevin Samuels, for influencing the policy change.

New Guidelines and Industry Reactions

Under the new AI guidelines, high school students will engage in "AI literacy" courses and gain limited access to a select few pilot AI programs, none of which are chatbots. Teachers, however, will still be able to utilize generative AI tools for lesson planning, though not for grading. Joe Philleo, CEO of Edia, one of the approved high school programs, praised the moratorium as a "reasonable balance," while Amira's CEO, Mark Angel, defended his company's software as a valuable tool for teachers, particularly in diagnosing reading challenges. Mamdani characterized the moratorium as the most "comprehensive of its kind," reflecting a nationwide grappling with the appropriate integration of generative AI in education.

The Broader Educational Ramifications

The moratorium has drawn criticism from those who believe it's a "hysterical response" that could hinder students' preparedness for the future job market. Rodrigues argued that while AI has a place in the classroom with proper oversight, a blanket ban rather than a nuanced approach is detrimental. City officials maintain that the pause is temporary, designed to allow for a thorough assessment of AI's impact on children's learning abilities. Neuroscientist Kaliris Salas-Ramirez, a supporter of the pause, highlighted research suggesting that excessive AI use in young children could impede the development of crucial problem-solving skills, preventing comprehensive information consolidation in their formative brains. For parents like Garrett, the reduced use of AI apps like Amira is a relief, as he believes they don't offer anything teachers couldn't already provide.

See More

A Senior Engineer's Guide to Leveraging AI: When to Trust, When to Create

In today's rapidly evolving technological landscape, artificial intelligence (AI) has become an indispensable tool across various industries. This article summarizes a seasoned engineer's perspective on judiciously employing AI in the workplace, stressing the balance between automation and human oversight. It delves into strategic approaches for maximizing AI's benefits while acknowledging its limitations, offering practical advice for professionals aiming to integrate AI seamlessly into their daily tasks.

Navigating the AI Frontier: A Senior Engineer's Strategic Approach

In 2026, Brandon Pedersen, a distinguished senior principal engineer at GoTo, situated in the vibrant Salt Lake City metropolitan area, unveiled his refined strategies for integrating artificial intelligence into professional workflows. As a pivotal leader of an AI enablement team, Pedersen's responsibilities span maintaining sophisticated AI platforms, developing innovative tools to boost operational efficiency, and offering crucial training and consultation services across the enterprise. His insights, shared on September 4, 2026, emphasize the nuanced art of leveraging AI, advocating for a discerning approach to its application.

Pedersen's daily agenda is dynamic and diverse. One moment he might be guiding a team on crafting more effective AI prompts, and the next, he could be automating complex workflows through specialized AI skills or bespoke applications. His team meticulously identifies and evaluates potential AI use cases from various departments, prioritizing those with the most significant business impact. Their objective is not merely to automate but to empower teams to construct their own AI-driven applications, fostering a culture of innovation and self-sufficiency.

Drawing upon his extensive tenure at GoTo, Pedersen possesses a unique ability to bridge departmental gaps, collaborating with diverse teams, including marketing and sales, to weave together disparate technological threads. His recommendations for integrating AI are rooted in years of practical experience and a deep understanding of both its potential and its pitfalls:

  • Maintain a Critical Perspective: Pedersen strongly advises against blindly trusting AI. Early in his AI journey, even minor tasks like generating a line of code often contained errors. While AI's accuracy has improved for simpler functions, he notes that inaccuracies persist in more complex applications. He champions a skeptical yet open-minded approach, treating AI outputs as drafts that require meticulous human review, similar to scrutinizing code or pull requests.

  • Master Prompt Precision: The quality of AI output is directly proportional to the clarity and specificity of the input prompts. Pedersen highlights how subtle changes in wording can drastically alter results. He encourages users to view AI outputs through the lens of an experienced engineer, always seeking opportunities for improvement, clarification, or correction.

  • Reserve Mission-Critical Tasks for Human Expertise: When faced with high-stakes tasks, such as formulating the internal AI governance policy, Pedersen opts for a human-centric approach. He argues that while AI can generate plausible documents, it often lacks the contextual understanding and nuanced judgment necessary for policies that will face critical internal scrutiny. In such cases, AI is best utilized for supplementary tasks, like creating diagrams or supporting artifacts, rather than drafting the core policy language.

  • Embrace the "Two-Second Rule" for Delegation: Pedersen cautions against over-automating trivial tasks. He observes that many individuals spend more time struggling with an AI tool than it would take to complete the task manually. He advises against using AI for personal communications, emphasizing that human interaction values genuine input over automated responses. Furthermore, AI should not be entrusted with making critical judgments about people due to its lack of human values and comprehensive context.

  • Validate and Verify All Factual Claims: A cornerstone of Pedersen's philosophy is the rigorous validation of AI-generated information. He advocates for a practice, inspired by GoTo's finance group, of requesting sources for AI's answers, meticulously following those links, and scrutinizing the underlying logic. This critical mindset is especially crucial when dealing with unfamiliar subjects or when an AI's response seems counterintuitive. Challenging AI's output can often lead it to self-correct, refining its accuracy.

  • Begin Experimenting Now: Pedersen encourages immediate experimentation with AI. He points out that many professionals discover immense productivity gains in surprisingly short periods by simply articulating their needs to AI in natural language. This direct engagement fosters a sense of empowerment, enabling users to customize solutions and share their discoveries, thereby accelerating the collective learning curve within an organization.

Looking ahead, Pedersen acknowledges that AI's capabilities will continue to expand, offering increased speed and intelligence with fewer errors. However, he firmly believes that the human element—our judgment, critical thinking, and values—will remain paramount in harnessing AI's full potential, guiding its application responsibly and effectively.

The insights from Brandon Pedersen, a senior principal engineer, offer a compelling blueprint for navigating the complexities of AI integration in the workplace. His strategic approach underscores the irreplaceable value of human discernment, critical thinking, and ethical considerations even as AI technologies become more sophisticated. This perspective serves as a powerful reminder that while AI can amplify our capabilities, it is our inherent human qualities that will ultimately shape its most impactful and responsible applications. By fostering a culture of informed skepticism, precise engagement, and thoughtful delegation, organizations can truly unlock the transformative potential of AI while preserving the essence of human creativity and judgment.

See More