Cars

Porsche Acknowledges Error in Discontinuing a Significant Gasoline-Powered Model

Porsche's leadership, under former CEO Oliver Blume, has candidly acknowledged a strategic miscalculation regarding the discontinuation of a crucial internal combustion engine (ICE) model. What seemed like a logical decision at the time, predicated on the expected success of its electric counterpart, has since proven to be an oversight. This admission underscores the dynamic and often unpredictable nature of the automotive market, particularly during the transition towards electrification. The company is now actively working to rectify this misstep by reintroducing and emphasizing hybrid and traditional combustion engine options across its product lines, showcasing a flexible approach to meet evolving consumer demands and regulatory landscapes.

Blume, who recently transitioned from his role as Porsche's CEO to fully focus on leading the Volkswagen Group, revealed in a conversation with Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung that the decision to retire the first-generation gasoline Macan was flawed. While the original strategy was to offer diverse powertrain options, the belief was that the forthcoming electric Macan would seamlessly replace its gasoline predecessor. However, the market's reception and regulatory changes, particularly in Europe, where the model was withdrawn due to cybersecurity regulations, highlighted the need for a more diversified approach. The gasoline-powered Macan is slated for global discontinuation later this year, with production anticipated to conclude by mid-2026, leaving a temporary void in the lineup.

In response to this realization, Porsche is now developing a new combustion-engined crossover, intended to slot beneath the Cayenne and arrive by 2028. This upcoming model, while not bearing the Macan name, aims to recapture the segment previously served by its gasoline forebear. Early indications suggest this new vehicle will share architectural components with the Audi Q5, leveraging Volkswagen Group synergies. Unlike the outgoing Macan, which featured a sophisticated rear-biased all-wheel-drive system, the new model is expected to utilize a front-wheel-drive-based Quattro Ultra system. This shift reflects a pragmatic approach to development, prioritizing efficiency and cost-effectiveness in light of current market pressures and the significant investments Porsche is making in other areas, including a larger three-row SUV and the reintroduction of gasoline engines for the Boxster and Cayman, reversing previous EV-only plans.

The automotive industry's pivot towards electric vehicles is complex, and even well-established manufacturers like Porsche can misjudge the pace and preferences of consumers. This instance serves as a notable example of a leading automotive brand adapting its long-term strategy in response to real-world market dynamics and operational challenges. The openness with which Porsche has addressed this issue provides valuable insight into the decision-making processes within major global corporations navigating technological shifts.

Mazda Miata Continues Strong Sales Performance A Decade After Its Debut

In an automotive market often characterized by declining sales for aging models, the Mazda Miata stands out, continuing to attract buyers with remarkable consistency. Despite being on the market for a decade, the beloved roadster's sales figures remain strong, underscoring its unique appeal and lack of direct competitors. While some consumers might consider alternatives like the Subaru BRZ or Toyota GR86, the Miata's distinct character allows it to maintain its dedicated customer base.

Last year saw a significant surge in Miata's popularity, with sales climbing by 7.7 percent to 8,727 units in the United States. This performance is particularly impressive given that the fourth-generation ND model first hit the dealerships in late 2015. While the 2017 peak of 11,294 units remains the highest, the sustained demand for the Miata highlights its enduring relevance in a segment increasingly dominated by larger, heavier vehicles. This steady interest is a testament to the car's fundamental design principles, emphasizing driving purity over excessive technology.

Looking ahead, Mazda is not resting on its laurels. The company plans for the Miata's future, with expectations for the next generation to arrive no earlier than 2028. Engineers are targeting an even lighter design, aiming to keep the weight below 2,205 pounds (1,000 kilograms). Furthermore, Mazda has hinted at incorporating a new, naturally aspirated 2.5-liter Skyactiv-Z engine, exclusively paired with a manual transmission, ensuring the Miata retains its essence as a driver-focused machine that prioritizes engagement and simplicity, offering a refreshing counterpoint to the prevailing trends in the automotive industry.

The Mazda Miata's sustained success is a powerful illustration of the value of focusing on core principles: simplicity, lightweight design, and an unadulterated driving experience. In an era where cars are becoming increasingly complex and disconnected from the road, the Miata serves as a beacon for enthusiasts who cherish the pure joy of driving. Its unwavering popularity demonstrates that innovation isn't just about adding more features or power, but also about refining what truly matters and delivering an authentic connection between driver and machine. This commitment not only ensures its longevity but also inspires a deeper appreciation for the art of automotive engineering and the sheer pleasure of the open road.

See More

Tesla's Cybercab Trademark Application Hits a Snag

This article details Tesla's unexpected predicament concerning the trademark of its new autonomous taxi service, the "Cybercab." It explains how a procedural misstep—unveiling the name publicly before securing the trademark—led to its acquisition by another company, UniBev. The piece highlights the consequences of this oversight and Tesla's limited options moving forward.

Tesla's Trademark Mishap: A Cautionary Tale in Brand Protection

The "Cybercab" Naming Conundrum

Tesla, a prominent innovator in electric vehicles, has recently faced a significant challenge in its quest to secure the trademark for its forthcoming electric taxi, known as "Cybercab." This unexpected obstacle arose when the United States Patent and Trademark Office intervened, putting a halt to Tesla's application process for the coveted name.

An Elementary Lesson Overlooked

The core of Tesla's issue appears to stem from a fundamental oversight, akin to forgetting basic principles taught in early education. Despite a workforce renowned for its ingenuity, the company proceeded with a public announcement of the "Cybercab" designation prior to officially filing for its trademark. This critical sequencing error ultimately allowed another entity to claim the name first.

The Public Unveiling and Subsequent Delay

On October 10, 2024, the electric vehicle giant showcased its "Cybercab" robotaxi to a global audience. However, the formal application for the trademark with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office did not occur until a full week later, on October 17. This delay proved costly, as the initial application faced complications due to potential conflicts with an existing patent held by Pirelli. This window of opportunity was seized by UniBev, a French beverage firm, which promptly filed for and secured the trademark.

UniBev's Acquisition of "Cybercab" Rights

As of December 12, 2025, UniBev has officially obtained both U.S. and international rights to the "Cybercab" name. Tesla's application records confirm that a suspension notice was issued on November 14, 2025, effectively preventing further progress on their claim to the brand. This turn of events underscores the importance of meticulous planning in intellectual property matters.

Navigating Forward: Tesla's Strategic Choices

The current situation suggests that Tesla is left with two primary courses of action: either negotiate with UniBev to acquire the trademark or choose an entirely different name for its autonomous taxi service. While the former seems the more probable path, it serves as a stark reminder for the company to prioritize proper legal procedures before any public declarations of future product names.

See More