MotoGP Constructors Seek F1-Style Concorde Agreement for Revenue and Grid Slot Control

MotoGP's leading manufacturers have collectively initiated discussions to establish a comprehensive framework with Dorna, the series promoter. This proposed agreement seeks to redefine the distribution of commercial revenues and grant teams greater control over their participation, drawing inspiration from Formula 1's long-standing Concorde Agreement. This bold step underscores a desire for enhanced financial equity and increased stability within the premier motorcycle racing championship.
A recent meeting during the Czech Grand Prix saw all five constructors unite to sign a commitment document, designating Lin Jarvis, a former Yamaha director and current advisor, as their primary representative. Subsequently, Jarvis, alongside Massimo Rivola, president of the Manufacturers’ Association (MSMA), engaged in discussions with Dorna CEO Carmelo Ezpeleta. Their objective was to convey the manufacturers' shared aspiration to re-evaluate the allocation of financial resources generated by the championship. This joint effort, initially driven by the factories, has since received the backing of the satellite teams, demonstrating a unified front across the paddock.
The manufacturers' current push for a new agreement comes at a pivotal time, especially in the wake of Liberty Media's recent acquisition of Dorna. The multi-billion euro deal, which saw Liberty Media take over the commercial rights to MotoGP, has intensified scrutiny over the financial model. There is a palpable belief within the paddock that the existing financial returns for teams are disproportionate to the championship's overall revenue, a sentiment that fuels the desire for a more equitable system. This also explains the increasing interest from investment funds in acquiring independent teams, despite the current valuation challenges posed by Dorna's ownership of grid slots.
A core element of the manufacturers' proposal centers on replicating the Formula 1 Concorde Agreement. While the exact details of F1's arrangement are confidential, it is widely known that it ties revenue distribution to championship performance, with significant financial implications for higher-placed teams. This model ensures that participants receive a substantial portion, reportedly around 50%, of the championship's profits. MotoGP manufacturers are keen to adopt a similar performance-based revenue sharing model to incentivize investment and competitiveness.
Beyond financial concerns, the manufacturers are also seeking greater autonomy over grid slots. Currently, Dorna holds ownership of these slots, leasing them to teams for fixed periods, with the latest five-year agreements concluding at the end of 2026. The teams aim to acquire legal ownership or, at the very least, robust guarantees that would reduce their dependence on Dorna's discretion. This move is critical for long-term planning and for increasing the perceived value of teams to potential investors, especially given Dorna's current valuation of each team at approximately 20 million euros—a figure many find difficult to justify without greater team control over their competitive presence.
The current financial structure sees only satellite teams receiving a fixed payment of 2.5 million euros per leased motorcycle, amounting to 5 million euros for two bikes. Manufacturers contend that this model is insufficient for sustainable growth and investment, especially as Dorna calls for increased development and participation from them. The historical precedent of the Concorde Agreement in Formula 1, which successfully resolved conflicts between governing bodies and constructors, offers a template for MotoGP to achieve a more collaborative and financially robust future. Future negotiations, likely to resume at the upcoming event in Austria, will be crucial in shaping the financial landscape and competitive structure of MotoGP for years to come.
The collective action by MotoGP constructors to push for a more equitable distribution of commercial rights and increased control over championship entries marks a significant turning point for the sport, signaling a clear demand for greater transparency and financial stability in the wake of recent ownership changes.