Car Show

GM Patents Camera-Based Automatic Launch Control System for Drag Racing

General Motors has recently been granted a patent for a groundbreaking camera-based launch control system, poised to transform the drag racing experience. This innovative technology is designed to observe the Christmas Tree lights at a drag strip, precisely anticipating the green signal to execute a flawless automatic launch. The system takes full control of braking, torque, and throttle, effectively eliminating the need for manual driver intervention at the starting line.

GM's Revolutionary Drag-Strip Launch Automation

The patent, officially titled "Methods and Systems for Coordinating Launch Control for Vehicles for Racing," was granted on November 3rd. It details a sophisticated camera setup that captures images of the staging lights and employs advanced software to interpret the light sequence. A central control unit then meticulously orchestrates the vehicle's launch, managing critical parameters like brake pressure, torque delivery, and throttle application. This system aims to provide an unprecedented level of precision and consistency in drag race starts.

The system is engineered to differentiate between various starting-light patterns, specifically the 'Pro Tree' and 'Sportsman Tree' formats. The 'Pro Tree' simultaneously illuminates all three amber lights, with the green light appearing 0.4 seconds later, emphasizing rapid reaction. Conversely, the 'Sportsman Tree' lights up its amber bulbs sequentially, with a half-second interval before the green. GM's patented technology is capable of recognizing either pattern and adjusting its launch timing predictions accordingly, ensuring an optimized start for any race format.

This development signifies GM's continued push towards automating driving functions, mirroring previous patents for active aerodynamic control and over-the-air camera updates. While the patent does not specify a particular vehicle model or a production timeline, its potential impact on drag racing is considerable. Observers from publications such as Road & Track have highlighted its capacity to usher in an era of "push-button drag racing," noting keen interest in how accurately this system can achieve perfect launch timing.

However, questions remain regarding the system's performance under challenging conditions, such as poor lighting or unfamiliar track environments. Despite these considerations, the patent represents a significant leap in automotive performance technology, potentially offering both amateur and professional racers a new tool to enhance their quarter-mile times.

A Glimpse into the Future of Automotive Performance and Accessibility

The advent of GM's camera-based launch control system sparks considerable thought about the future of high-performance driving and the role of automation. From a technological standpoint, this innovation exemplifies the growing sophistication of automotive engineering, where artificial intelligence and advanced sensors are increasingly integrated to augment vehicle capabilities. This could pave the way for more accessible and consistent high-performance experiences, allowing a broader range of enthusiasts to engage in activities like drag racing with greater confidence and precision.

Yet, it also raises important discussions about the essence of driving skill and human-machine interaction. While automation promises perfection, it might also diminish the raw, visceral challenge that many traditionalists cherish in motorsports. As vehicles become more autonomous in their functions, the debate between enhancing performance through technology and preserving the human element of driving will undoubtedly continue to evolve. Ultimately, this patent from GM is not just about launching a car faster; it's about redefining the boundaries of what's possible and prompting a reevaluation of the driver's role in the pursuit of speed.

2027 GMC Sierra: V8 Engines More Potent, Less Fuel-Efficient Than Diesel

The 2027 GMC Sierra 1500 is set to hit the market with a revamped engine lineup, where new V8 powerplants promise enhanced performance but sacrifice fuel economy when compared to the returning 3.0-liter Duramax diesel. Official EPA figures reveal a clear trade-off: truck enthusiasts seeking raw power will find it in the redesigned V8s, but those prioritizing efficiency will gravitate towards the diesel option, which consistently outperforms its gasoline counterparts in miles per gallon across all two-wheel and four-wheel-drive configurations.

A closer look at the efficiency numbers highlights this disparity. The two-wheel-drive 5.7-liter V8 model achieves an estimated 17 mpg combined (15 city/19 highway). In stark contrast, the comparable two-wheel-drive Duramax diesel variant boasts an impressive 25 mpg combined. This substantial eight mpg difference translates into significant long-term savings for drivers who opt for the diesel, especially considering the operational costs associated with daily driving, towing, or hauling. The gap in fuel efficiency directly impacts the financial considerations for potential buyers comparing the new generation of V8 engines against the established six-cylinder diesel.

For example, the 5.7-liter L76 V8 in two-wheel-drive Pro and Elevation trims is rated at 15 city, 19 highway, and 17 combined mpg. When equipped with four-wheel-drive, across Pro, Elevation, AT4, and Denali trims, this engine yields 16 city, 20 highway, and 18 combined mpg. Moving to the larger 6.6-liter V8, Denali and Denali Ultimate models see 14 city, 18 highway, and 15 combined mpg. The off-road-focused AT4X with the 6.6-liter V8 achieves 13 city, 17 highway, and 15 combined mpg, with a slight dip to 13 city, 16 highway, and 14 combined for versions fitted with mud-terrain tires.

Conversely, the Duramax diesel presents a compelling case for efficiency. Two-wheel-drive diesel trucks in Pro, Elevation, and Denali trims achieve 23 city, 28 highway, and 25 combined mpg. Four-wheel-drive Duramax models, available in Pro, Elevation, AT4, and Denali, offer 22 city, 26 highway, and 24 combined mpg. Even the Duramax-powered AT4X, typically the least fuel-efficient variant in any truck lineup, manages 20 city, 22 highway, and 21 combined mpg. This represents a six mpg combined advantage over its gasoline-powered AT4X equivalent on standard all-terrain tires, a difference that could significantly influence the budgets of truck owners who frequently engage in demanding tasks.

Comparing the new V8s to their predecessors reveals a consistent trend. The new 402-horsepower 5.7-liter V8, which replaces the outgoing 5.3-liter unit, offers more power but falls short on efficiency. The 2026 5.3-liter V8 in four-wheel-drive configurations achieved 16 city, 20 highway, and 17 combined mpg, surpassing the new 5.7-liter's combined rating. Similarly, the 481-horsepower 6.6-liter V8, a replacement for the 6.2-liter engine, follows the same pattern. The previous 6.2-liter V8 delivered 15 city, 19 highway, and 17 combined mpg, which is two mpg better than the new 6.6-liter's 15 mpg combined rating in comparable Denali models. It's worth noting that all four engine options in the 2027 Sierra lineup are paired with a 10-speed automatic transmission, indicating that the observed differences in efficiency are primarily due to engine displacement, tuning, and compression ratios rather than gearing variations.

For prospective buyers navigating the 2027 Sierra's pricing and trim options alongside real-world operational expenses, the message is clear: the redesigned V8 engines deliver an increase in power but come with a reduction in fuel economy compared to the engines they succeed. The Duramax diesel engine, however, maintains its position as the undisputed leader in efficiency, offering a substantial advantage for those who prioritize lower running costs and reduced fuel consumption.

See More

Arkansas Dealer Lists Corvette ZR1X Convertible for $696,445, Citing 'Extreme Exclusivity'

A Chevrolet dealership in Arkansas has ignited a debate within the automotive community by offering a Corvette ZR1X convertible at an astonishing price of nearly $700,000. This eye-watering sum includes a $400,000 premium on top of the manufacturer's suggested retail price, which the dealer dubs an "Exclusive Market Value Adjustment." This bold pricing strategy, justified by claims of "extreme exclusivity" and high market demand, comes despite Chevrolet's lack of official confirmation regarding any limited production run for the ZR1X. The incident highlights the ongoing tension between dealer markups and consumer expectations in the high-performance car market.

Arkansas Dealership Lists Corvette ZR1X with $400,000 Markup, Igniting Controversy

In an audacious move that has sent ripples through the automotive world, George Nunnally Chevrolet in Arkansas has listed a 2026 Chevrolet Corvette ZR1X convertible for an astounding $696,445. This price includes a substantial $400,000 "Exclusive Market Value Adjustment" added to the vehicle's $296,445 sticker price. The specific model in question is a fully-loaded ZR1X 3LZ convertible, a variant positioned far above the base coupe models. For context, the 2027 ZR1X 1LZ coupe has a listed MSRP of $227,695, meaning the dealer's markup alone is nearly double the cost of an entry-level ZR1X.

The extraordinary price tag first gained widespread attention after being reported by *MotorBiscuit*. The publication detailed the dealership's breakdown: a $296,445 MSRP for the well-equipped 3LZ convertible, augmented by the hefty $400,000 market adjustment. Official 2027 Corvette pricing guides indicate the ZR1X 1LZ coupe at $227,695 and the 1LZ convertible at $237,695, illustrating a $10,000 difference between body styles. Powering the ZR1X is a formidable combination of the ZR1's twin-turbocharged LT7 V8 engine and a dedicated front electric drive unit, collectively delivering an impressive 1,250 horsepower and all-wheel drive, making it the most potent production Corvette to date.

George Nunnally Chevrolet's listing attempts to justify the premium by stating the car is produced in "strictly limited production quantities from Bowling Green Assembly." However, Chevrolet has not officially designated the ZR1X as a numbered or limited special edition, nor have they published any production caps, which significantly undermines the dealership's scarcity claim. In a statement, the dealership asserted that these "market adjustments reflect authentic real-time secondary and primary market demand," positioning the $400,000 add-on as a reflection of current market dynamics. This reasoning, however, clashes with Chevrolet's own published pricing, which for the 2026 ZR1X 1LZ coupe began at $207,395 (including destination) and later saw modest increases to $227,695 for the 2027 model, a figure far removed from the dealer's added value.

This incident is not an isolated one; dealer markups on highly sought-after Corvette trims have become a recurring issue, with previous models like the 2025 Corvette Z06 also experiencing significant price inflation. Even with planned price increases across the 2027 Corvette lineup, which provide dealers a higher base, such extreme markups remain controversial. Corvette chief engineer Tony Roma has previously indicated that recent high-performance Corvettes are "not the end of the story" for the model's evolution, suggesting ongoing development of the platform. This perspective contrasts sharply with dealerships that market early ZR1X inventory as singular, once-in-a-lifetime acquisitions.

The exorbitant pricing of this Corvette ZR1X serves as a stark reminder of the complexities and frustrations within the luxury and performance car markets. While demand for such vehicles is undoubtedly high, the practice of adding massive, unsubstantiated markups by dealerships raises questions about fairness, transparency, and consumer trust. It challenges buyers to weigh the desire for immediate ownership of a coveted vehicle against potentially inflated prices that do not align with official manufacturer valuations. Ultimately, such practices could erode brand loyalty and tarnish the image of both dealerships and manufacturers, prompting a need for more regulated and transparent pricing models in the future.

See More