Racing

Formula E Season 2024-25: A Recap of Triumphs and Setbacks

The recently concluded 2024-25 Formula E season was a spectacle of electric racing, delivering both exhilarating highs and frustrating lows for participants. Oliver Rowland claimed the coveted world championship title with a commanding performance, marking a significant milestone in his career. However, not every competitor experienced similar success, as some drivers and teams grappled with underperformance and unforeseen difficulties throughout the season. Tyre performance, particularly in wet conditions, also became a prominent talking point, highlighting areas for future improvement in the championship.

This season underscored the unpredictable nature of Formula E, where strategic prowess and driver skill are constantly tested. While some celebrated remarkable comebacks and consistent top finishes, others faced a challenging path, revealing the thin line between triumph and disappointment in professional motorsport. The varied outcomes across the paddock offer a compelling narrative of resilience, adaptation, and the relentless pursuit of excellence in the all-electric racing series.

Season Highlights: Champions and Breakthroughs

The 2024-25 Formula E season celebrated the crowning of Oliver Rowland as the new world champion, a testament to his exceptional driving and Nissan's strong package. Rowland's season began with an assertive display, securing multiple victories and podium finishes in the first half, positioning him as an early championship favorite. His consistent performance, particularly in crucial moments, ultimately led him to become the tenth unique champion in the series' history. His achievement highlights not only his individual talent but also the effectiveness of his team's strategic execution.

Another significant winner was Taylor Barnard, whose rookie season defied expectations. Stepping in as a substitute driver, Barnard quickly demonstrated his capabilities, earning podiums in Sao Paulo and Jeddah, and clinching a pole position. His rapid adaptation and strong results culminated in a commendable fourth-place finish in the drivers' standings, signaling a bright future in Formula E despite McLaren's impending departure. Additionally, Mahindra's remarkable turnaround, nearly quadrupling its points from the previous year and securing five podiums, showcased the impact of strategic regulation changes and dedicated development, culminating in a strong fourth-place team finish.

Challenges and Disappointments: The Other Side of the Grid

While some basked in glory, others endured a less fortunate Formula E campaign. Zane Maloney faced a particularly tough rookie season, becoming the only full-time driver to finish without scoring a single point. Despite the inherent difficulties of taming the Lola Yamaha ABT car, his inability to break into the top 10 underscored the steep learning curve and fierce competition in the series. Maloney's season serves as a stark reminder that talent alone does not guarantee immediate success in the demanding world of Formula E, especially when battling against experienced competitors and challenging machinery.

Veteran driver Robin Frijns also experienced a dismal year, finishing a surprising 19th in the championship. Despite his extensive experience and past successes, Frijns struggled to find form, with his best result being a seventh-place finish. This contrasts sharply with his teammate Sebastien Buemi's strong performance, which included a win and multiple podiums. The disparity in results within the same team suggests underlying issues that hindered Frijns's performance. Furthermore, Norman Nato, despite a maiden pole position, had a disappointing season marked by a significant point deficit to his teammate, ultimately impacting Nissan's championship aspirations and raising questions about his future with the team. Finally, tyre supplier Hankook received widespread criticism for its all-weather tyres, which proved ill-suited for the frequent wet races, leading to calls for dedicated wet weather compounds in future seasons.

WRC 2026 Calendar Announced: Japan Moves, USA Absent, Italy's Venue Undecided

The World Rally Championship has formally released its itinerary for the 2026 season, confirming a 14-event schedule that includes some strategic adjustments and the continuation of certain trends, yet omits a much-anticipated return to North America. This announcement outlines key shifts designed to optimize the competitive landscape and maintain the series' global footprint.

Charting the Future: WRC's 2026 Season Revealed

Strategic Calendar Modifications and Key Dates for the 2026 World Rally Championship

The upcoming 2026 World Rally Championship season will encompass a total of 14 rounds, commencing in January with the classic Monte Carlo Rally and concluding in November with a gravel event in Saudi Arabia. A significant alteration for the 2026 season involves Rally Japan, which will transition from its traditional November slot to May, becoming the seventh round of the championship, held from May 28-31.

Addressing the Impact of Road Sweeping with Japan's Calendar Shift

This strategic repositioning of Rally Japan aims to disrupt the extended sequence of gravel rallies, thereby mitigating the advantage of road sweeping for championship front-runners. Recent seasons, particularly since 2023, have featured a prolonged stretch of seven consecutive gravel events, leading to considerable discussion regarding the implications of road position regulations.

The Continued Absence of a US Event in the World Rally Championship Schedule

Hopes for the World Rally Championship's return to the United States, a venue last visited for the Olympus Rally in 1988, have been deferred. Despite previous reports indicating a multi-year agreement for an event in Tennessee, contingent on approvals from the FIA and ACCUS, the 2026 calendar will not feature a US-based round, pushing back plans for at least another year.

Italy's Unspecified Rally Location and Croatia's Re-entry into the Championship

The announced calendar leaves the specific location for Italy's round unconfirmed. This event is slated to occur in October, serving as the penultimate rally of the season, a departure from its customary June timing. Historically, Sardinia's demanding gravel stages have hosted the Italian WRC round since 2004, with the exception of 2009, following its move from Sanremo. Additionally, Italy featured in the WRC in 2020 and 2021 with Rally Monza due to COVID-19 related adjustments. Meanwhile, Croatia will rejoin the championship following its temporary relocation to the European Rally Championship this year, a move that effectively removes the Central European Rally from the schedule, attributed to prevailing economic conditions.

Optimizing Competition and Expanding Global Reach: Officials' Perspectives on the 2026 WRC Calendar

Jona Siebel, the managing director for WRC Promoter, emphasized that the 2026 calendar was meticulously crafted to ensure diversity and a smooth flow of events, incorporating feedback from teams and drivers to enhance the competitive aspect. FIA President Mohammed Ben Sulayem added that the 2026 WRC calendar exemplifies the championship's widespread strength and allure, balancing esteemed rallies with the inclusion of newer events in regions demonstrating growing interest and participation in rallying.

Comprehensive Overview of the 2026 World Rally Championship Schedule

The detailed 2026 World Rally Championship schedule is as follows:

  • Round 1: Monte-Carlo, January 22–25 (Asphalt/Ice)
  • Round 2: Sweden, February 12–15 (Snow)
  • Round 3: Kenya, March 12–15 (Gravel)
  • Round 4: Croatia, April 9–12 (Asphalt)
  • Round 5: Gran Canaria, April 23–26 (Asphalt)
  • Round 6: Portugal, May 7–10 (Gravel)
  • Round 7: Japan, May 28–31 (Asphalt)
  • Round 8: Acropolis (Greece), June 25-28 (Gravel)
  • Round 9: Estonia, July 16–19 (Gravel)
  • Round 10: Finland, July 30–August 2 (Gravel)
  • Round 11: Paraguay, August 27–30 (Gravel)
  • Round 12: Chile, September 10–13 (Gravel)
  • Round 13: Italy, October 1–4 (Surface TBC)
  • Round 14: Saudi Arabia, November 11–14 (Gravel)
See More

Tsunoda: "Unfair" to Compare to Verstappen Without Identical Red Bull F1 Car

Yuki Tsunoda, a driver for Red Bull, has voiced his opinion that it is unjust to directly compare his performance to that of Max Verstappen, citing the discrepancies in their respective Red Bull F1 car specifications. While a recent floor upgrade positively impacted his qualifying at the Belgian Grand Prix, Tsunoda's vehicle still lacks some of the most current elements found in Verstappen's car. This disparity highlights the ongoing challenge for the second driver at Red Bull, who often faces a rigorous environment with limited time to demonstrate their capabilities against a dominant teammate. Tsunoda remains committed to his individual development, despite the inherent difficulties of competing with unequal machinery against one of the sport's most formidable talents.

For several seasons, Red Bull has functioned akin to a single-car team, largely due to the consistent excellence of Max Verstappen and the frequent turnover in the second driver's seat. Pilots in this position are given a tight timeframe to prove their worth before facing potential dismissal or reassignment. Verstappen's extraordinary talent is widely recognized, yet assessing other drivers against him becomes problematic when they do not have access to an identical car setup, particularly with a demanding vehicle like the RB21.

Yuki Tsunoda's progression to Red Bull, following Liam Lawson's brief tenure, has seen him achieve a top-ten finish on only three occasions. His time with the team has been marked by notable incidents, such as his qualifying crash at Imola, which damaged a newly installed floor. However, during the recent Belgian Grand Prix weekend, an updated floor allowed him to reach Q3, a first since the Miami race. Despite this improvement, he finished outside the points, a result the team attributed to poor communication regarding tire strategy. Even with the 'new' floor, it was revealed that Tsunoda's car did not possess the exact same specifications as Verstappen's, with further discrepancies, such as the front wing, noted ahead of the Hungarian Grand Prix.

Tsunoda expressed confidence in his team's engineering efforts, stating that despite missing out on points, there's clear progress. He articulated that comparing himself directly to Verstappen is unfair given Verstappen's nine years of experience with the car versus his own recent entry. Tsunoda aims to focus on his personal growth, advancing step by step, rather than being overshadowed by an uneven playing field. With Laurent Mekies, his former team principal at Racing Bulls, now at the helm and known for a more empathetic approach, Tsunoda might anticipate greater parity in equipment. Nevertheless, the ultimate challenge persists: whether any driver, even with comparable machinery, can truly rival Verstappen's consistent dominance remains a formidable question.

Ultimately, the inherent complexities of Formula 1, particularly within a team featuring a generational talent, mean that the performance of a second driver is often viewed through the prism of their teammate's achievements. Tsunoda's situation underscores the critical role that identical equipment and sustained development play in allowing drivers to showcase their full potential and avoid potentially unfair comparisons. As the season progresses, the focus will undoubtedly remain on whether Tsunoda can consistently narrow the performance gap, thereby solidifying his position within the competitive landscape of Formula 1.

See More