In the burgeoning segment of compact sport sedans, the year 2000 witnessed a compelling rivalry between two noteworthy contenders: the 2001 Dodge Neon R/T and the 2000 Nissan Sentra SE. This analysis, originally published in August 2000, delves into a detailed comparison of these vehicles, revealing their surprising congruences in cost, technical specifications, and on-road capabilities. While the Neon R/T exudes a vibrant and youthful charm, the Sentra SE presents a more understated yet refined character, reminiscent of its larger, more luxurious siblings. The evaluation scrutinizes their powertrains, chassis dynamics, interior appointments, and overall driving impressions, offering a comprehensive perspective on which model ultimately delivered a superior experience in this competitive niche.
The automotive landscape at the turn of the millennium was experiencing a renaissance for compact, performance-oriented cars, often dubbed 'pocket rockets.' Vehicles like the Volkswagen GTI and the Plymouth Colt Turbo had set a precedent for affordability combined with spirited performance and distinct personalities. Following a period dominated by modified Honda Civics, the segment was reignited with offerings such as the Dodge Neon ACR, introduced in 1998 for SCCA racing, and the reintroduction of the high-revving Honda Civic Si in 2000. Dodge further amplified this trend with the launch of the 2001 Neon R/T, priced at approximately $15,500, designed to inject a sporty essence into its new-generation Neon.
Under the hood, the Neon R/T featured a 150-horsepower variant of the 2.0-liter SOHC four-cylinder engine common across the Neon lineup. This power boost was achieved through an electronically controlled dual-plenum intake, optimized valve timing, and a reduced exhaust back pressure facilitated by a stainless-steel header and an enlarged 2.25-inch exhaust pipe culminating in dual tailpipes. Meanwhile, Nissan presented its Sentra SE, an evolution of its generally understated yet dynamically capable new Sentra. This model was powered by a refined 2.0-liter DOHC engine, which had previously garnered acclaim in the Sentra SE-R. The SE version also boasted a front strut-tower brace and firmer suspension settings, underscoring its sporty intentions. An optional performance package, priced at $899, further enhanced the Sentra SE with 195/55HR-16 tires on alloy wheels, a rear spoiler, a viscous limited-slip differential, an advanced audio system, side-sill extensions, and an anti-theft immobilizer, bringing its total price to around $16,397.
Despite their differing aesthetic philosophies—the Neon's flamboyant presence versus the Sentra's more mature and somewhat generic styling—these two cars demonstrated remarkable parallels in their core attributes. They were powered by similarly configured engines and shared an identical curb weight. Both incorporated typical sport-oriented upgrades, including distinctive white instrument faces, specially tuned suspensions, and enhanced wheel and tire combinations. This convergence of features set the stage for a closely contested battle between the two compact sedans.
The 2001 Dodge Neon R/T secured a commendable second-place finish in this comparison. While earlier Neon models, such as the ES, had been noted for their comfort-oriented, larger-car-like body movements, the R/T presented a different profile. It was equipped with sport-tuned springs, performance shocks, thicker anti-roll bars, recalibrated steering assist, and 50-series tires, resulting in a notably firm ride. Despite its enhanced chassis, the R/T exhibited considerable body roll during aggressive maneuvers, suggesting a balanced approach to chassis tuning that prioritized daily comfort without fully sacrificing sportiness. The interior, though comfortable with aggressive lumbar support, offered slightly less generous headroom in the rear due to its sloping roofline, and its design, while more adventurous than the Sentra's, featured textures and materials that felt less premium.
Ergonomically, the Neon R/T presented a mixed bag. Features like the auto-locking doors that only unlock the driver's side upon exit, and a push-button ignition key release, were noted as minor annoyances. The car also featured only one 12-volt power outlet and manually operated rear windows, despite its contemporary design. The placement of the four-disc CD changer beneath the center console was deemed inconvenient. However, the Neon excelled in storage capacity and integrated many functions into a single, intuitive light-switch stalk. Performance-wise, the R/T achieved 60 mph 0.3 seconds faster than the Sentra SE but was marginally slower in the quarter-mile. On the racetrack, the Neon's SCCA pedigree shone through, outpacing the Sentra by a significant 0.8 seconds on the Streets of Willow road course. Ultimately, the Neon R/T appealed to drivers seeking a vehicle with extroverted aesthetics, genuine sporting credentials, and a youthful, energetic character.
The 2000 Nissan Sentra SE emerged as the winner in this head-to-head comparison, largely due to its meticulous engineering and refined driving experience. While its exterior styling, particularly the rear, was described as somewhat generic, the addition of a rear spoiler on the SE model was seen as an improvement. Regardless of its visual appeal, the Sentra SE impressed with its driving dynamics, offering the poise and solidity typically associated with larger, more expensive vehicles. Its 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine, though redlined at a lower 6750 rpm for emissions compliance, delivered a pleasant, subdued growl and responsive throttle. The leather-wrapped steering wheel provided light yet precise control, and the shifter offered a smooth, fluid action, making gear changes a satisfying endeavor. Despite a sporty suspension setup, the Sentra SE maintained a reasonably comfortable ride, with only minor intrusions from road imperfections and some tire noise on the freeway. The interior of the Sentra SE was praised for its supportive seating, with adjustable cushion angle and height, and its slightly European-inspired design that used richer textures and surfaces compared to the Neon. Additional conveniences included an extra 12-volt outlet and a practical storage compartment on the dashboard. However, the cupholders were awkwardly positioned, and the upholstery pattern was less appealing than the door inserts. Despite having slightly less rear passenger space and trunk volume than the Neon, the Sentra's cargo area was often more practical due to fewer intrusions. Nissan's marketing of the Sentra as a 'destination' vehicle, one that provided more than just basic transportation, was validated by the SE's smooth, solid feel, elegant interior, and composed handling, making it a truly satisfying compact sedan.
