Cars

China's New Car Safety Rule: Out with Hidden Door Handles

China has officially introduced groundbreaking regulations that prohibit the use of hidden door handles on vehicles. This new policy, effective from January 1, 2027, mandates that all cars sold in the country must feature mechanically operable external and internal door releases. The legislation aims to enhance safety, particularly in emergency situations, by ensuring easy access to vehicle occupants.

This shift in policy directly addresses design trends in modern automobiles, especially electric vehicles, where concealed handles have become popular for their aerodynamic benefits. The ban specifically targets both the flush-fitting, pop-out handles (like those on some Tesla models) and the electrically powered retractable handles (seen on vehicles such as the Kia EV9). Furthermore, semi-hidden handles are now required to have a minimum recessed area of 2.4 by 0.8 inches, facilitating a secure grip. Vehicles must also display clear instructions inside on how to open the doors.

The impetus for these new rules stems from recent incidents involving electric vehicles in China, where power failures following crashes rendered hidden door handles inoperable, trapping occupants. Given China's dominant position as the world's largest automotive market, these regulations are expected to have a profound impact on global car manufacturers, potentially leading to a widespread re-evaluation of car door handle designs and a renewed focus on practical safety features.

Emphasizing safety through thoughtful design not only protects individuals but also drives innovation that genuinely benefits humanity. By prioritizing accessibility and functionality, the automotive industry can continue to advance while upholding its responsibility to public well-being, fostering a future where technological progress and human safety go hand in hand.

Porsche Considers Scrapping Electric 718 Models Due to Development Hurdles

Porsche is at a critical juncture, reassessing its future electric vehicle strategy. Recent reports suggest the luxury automaker may reconsider the launch of its highly anticipated electric 718 models, the Cayman and Boxster, due to various challenges encountered during their development.

Porsche's Electric Future: A Crossroads for the 718 Twins

Uncertain Future for Porsche's Electric Sports Cars

The long-awaited electric versions of Porsche's iconic 718 Cayman and Boxster face an uncertain future. Despite previous plans for a 2025 launch, new reports indicate that the company's CEO, Michael Leiters, is evaluating the possibility of halting their production altogether. This potential shift marks a significant reconsideration of Porsche's electric sports car ambitions.

Financial Pressures and Development Roadblocks

A primary driver behind this potential decision is the mounting financial pressure stemming from development delays and increased expenses. Sources close to the matter suggest that these cost escalations are making it challenging for Porsche to balance its books, particularly with the extensive resources already invested in the electric 718 program.

A Shifting Electric Vehicle Landscape

Discussions surrounding the electric 718 models have been ongoing for over six years. The original target was a 2025 release, but the project has encountered significant delays. Adding to the complexity, Porsche had previously stopped accepting orders for the internal combustion engine (ICE) 718 models in the U.S. in late 2025, only to later announce plans to adapt the EV platform to accommodate ICE powertrains once again. This strategic pivot highlights the evolving challenges and considerations within the electric vehicle market.

Navigating Economic Headwinds and Strategic Adjustments

The potential cancellation of the electric 718 models is also linked to broader economic challenges faced by Porsche, including a downturn in sales within the Chinese market and an increase in operational expenditures. These factors are compelling the company to refine its electric vehicle strategy, indicating a cautious approach to major investments in new electric models. While a final decision has not yet been announced, the ongoing internal discussions underscore the complexities of transitioning to an all-electric lineup.

See More

Secondhand Electric Vehicles: A Savvy Investment Over Traditional Cars

When considering vehicle acquisition, particularly in the pre-owned market, electric vehicles (EVs) present a compelling financial case over their gasoline and hybrid counterparts. While the new EV market in the United States currently lacks options under $25,000, prompting a search for more affordable alternatives, a recent study from the University of Michigan illuminates the profound long-term economic benefits of opting for a used EV. This research underscores that used EVs not only experience significant initial depreciation, making them more accessible, but also offer a superior total cost of ownership throughout their lifespan compared to equivalently aged internal combustion engine (ICE) or hybrid vehicles.

The comprehensive study, which meticulously analyzed 260,000 used vehicle listings from January to December 2024 across 17 major U.S. cities, concluded that a three-year-old electric midsize SUV can yield an impressive $13,000 in savings over a seven-year ownership period. In stark contrast, a comparable gasoline SUV would only save approximately $3,000, and hybrids/PHEVs a mere $1,000. These substantial savings stem from several key factors: the rapid depreciation of EVs in their initial years (some models losing over 60% of their value in five years), significantly lower maintenance and repair costs (a three-year-old electric midsize SUV can save $4,600 in these areas compared to an ICE equivalent), and the surprisingly slow rate of battery degradation. Telematics firm Geotab's 2025 study revealed an average battery degradation of only 1.8% per year, meaning a modern EV could retain about 64% of its original battery capacity even after two decades, well beyond the typical ownership period assumed in the Michigan study. However, it's crucial to acknowledge that an unexpected battery replacement shortly after warranty expiration could drastically alter the financial landscape, transforming an EV from the most economical to the most expensive option.

Ultimately, the decision to purchase a used EV is highly individualized, contingent on various factors such as driving habits, local electricity rates, the specific EV model, and the remaining warranty period. Despite these variables, the overarching trend indicates that a pre-owned EV can be a far more economical choice than a gasoline vehicle for cost-conscious buyers. By choosing a used EV, consumers can bypass many common maintenance issues associated with older gasoline cars, such as timing belt replacements and transmission fluid flushes, thereby embracing a more sustainable and financially prudent mode of transportation. With the average price of a new EV approaching $60,000, the used market offers an excellent opportunity for astute buyers to realize significant savings and contribute positively to environmental sustainability.

See More