Electric Cars

Beware: Using an Outdated Charger with Your Rivian R2 Could Lead to Meltdown

When journalist Tom Moloughney, known for his YouTube channel 'State of Charge,' connected his Rivian R2 to a CCS charging station using an older Tesla adapter, he encountered an unexpected and alarming issue: the adapter's pin melted. This incident isn't necessarily a malfunction of the vehicle itself but rather a consequence of the R2's specific design choices and the limitations of older NACS-to-CCS adapters. It serves as a crucial warning for current and future Rivian R2 owners.

The root of the problem lies in the distinction between voltage and amperage. To keep the R2's price point competitive while retaining the advanced features of its R1 predecessors, Rivian opted to use a 400-volt battery architecture, similar to the R1. Unlike many newer electric vehicles that utilize 800-volt systems, the R2 compensates for its lower voltage by drawing a higher amperage during charging to achieve comparable charging speeds. This increased current draw can overwhelm older adapters not designed to handle such high loads, leading to overheating and melting. Moloughney noted that modern adapters are generally more robust and capable of managing the R2's higher amperage requirements without issue. Given that the R2 features a native NACS port, owners will frequently need adapters to access CCS charging stations, such as those provided by Electrify America or ChargePoint.

This concern isn't exclusive to Rivian R2 owners. Other electric vehicles, including certain BMW, Polestar, and Tesla models, can also draw up to 600 amps or more. The R2 is particularly noteworthy for its ability to sustain these high amperage levels for extended periods. Therefore, owners of any EV capable of drawing 600 amps or more must ensure their charging adapters are rated to handle such power to prevent damage. While some adapters are designed to reduce the charging rate if they detect overheating, Moloughney's older Tesla adapter lacked this safety feature, leading to its demise. Fortunately, both Tesla and Rivian offer modern adapters capable of safely handling the R2's power demands. In certain CARB-compliant states, Rivian even includes a suitable adapter with the vehicle purchase, though customers might need to add it to their order.

Ensuring the safety of EV charging equipment is paramount. The melting of a charging adapter highlights the critical need for electric vehicle owners to use compatible and adequately rated accessories. By being informed and proactive, owners can prevent potential damage to their vehicles and charging equipment, ensuring a seamless and secure charging experience. This incident underscores the importance of technological advancements in EV infrastructure keeping pace with the evolving demands of newer electric vehicle models, promoting both innovation and user safety.

Hoymiles Launches First UL 3700 Certified Balcony Solar Microinverter in US

Hoymiles has unveiled its groundbreaking HiFlow Pro microinverter, marking a significant milestone as the first device of its kind in the United States to meet the rigorous UL 3700 safety standard. This certification is crucial for plug-in balcony solar installations, a growing trend that offers a compact and cost-effective alternative to traditional rooftop solar systems for both homeowners and renters. The HiFlow Pro exemplifies the industry's commitment to safety and accessibility, enabling more individuals to participate in renewable energy generation.

The adoption of plug-in solar technology is rapidly gaining momentum across the US, following its widespread success in European markets, particularly Germany. With eight states having already enacted legislation to support plug-in solar, and nearly 30 more considering similar measures, the regulatory landscape is evolving to accommodate this innovative energy solution. This legislative progress addresses a previous regulatory void, as existing solar guidelines were primarily designed for larger, permanent rooftop installations, paving the way for safer and more standardized deployment of balcony solar units.

The HiFlow Pro microinverter is engineered specifically for residential balcony solar applications, boasting a high efficiency of up to 99.8% in static maximum power point tracking (MPPT) and 99.5% dynamic efficiency. Its design ensures optimal energy harvesting even under varying weather conditions, with robust construction allowing operation in extreme temperatures. Furthermore, its user-friendly plug-and-play setup, managed via Bluetooth and Wi-Fi, facilitates quick installation. The device supports scalability, enabling multiple units to operate in parallel, significantly boosting annual energy production, and empowering consumers to generate a portion of their electricity safely and efficiently, thereby contributing to a greener future.

The introduction of the HiFlow Pro not only signifies a technological leap in residential solar solutions but also underscores the importance of stringent safety standards in fostering wider adoption of renewable energy. By providing a secure and accessible option for personal electricity generation, this innovation empowers individuals to contribute to sustainable living, regardless of their housing situation, ultimately advancing the collective pursuit of a more environmentally friendly and energy-independent society.

See More

Tesla's Full Self-Driving: A Speeding Ticket and a Lost Feature

This article explores the author's frustrating experience with Tesla's Full Self-Driving system, which led to an unexpected speeding ticket, and critically examines Tesla's decision to remove a crucial user-controlled speed customization feature.

Reclaiming Control: The Missing Link in Autonomous Driving

An Unfortunate Encounter with Law Enforcement While Using FSD

During a recent drive, while showcasing Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) system to friends, an incident occurred that resulted in a traffic citation. The vehicle, operating in Standard FSD mode, accelerated to 78 km/h within a designated 50 km/h zone. This unexpected increase in speed was observed by a police officer, leading to an immediate stop and the issuance of a speeding ticket.

Acknowledging Personal Responsibility in Autonomous Driving

It is important to clarify that the author fully accepts responsibility for the vehicle's operation at all times, even when FSD is active. The ticket received is acknowledged as a personal liability, and this account is not an attempt to transfer blame to Tesla. However, the incident highlights a significant concern regarding the current functionality of the FSD system.

The Core Issue: Beyond Simply Exceeding the Speed Limit

The central point of contention is not the FSD system's capability to exceed posted speed limits. Many drivers occasionally exceed these limits, within reasonable bounds, and an autonomous system could potentially adapt to such traffic flows. The actual problem lies in Tesla's decision to eliminate the user's ability to specify their preferred speed offset above the legal limit.

The Disappearance of a Valuable Customization Feature

Prior to the introduction of FSD v14, users had the flexibility to set their own desired speed offset above the limit. This allowed drivers to tailor the system's speed behavior to their individual comfort levels and local driving norms. For instance, a driver comfortable with a 10 km/h excess could configure the system accordingly. This highly valued feature was inexplicably removed with the release of FSD v14.

Preset Driving Modes Versus Personalized Control

The removal of the customizable speed offset has been replaced by a selection of predefined driving profiles: Sloth, Chill, Standard, Hurry, and Mad Max. While these presets offer varying driving characteristics, they lack the granularity and personalization of the previous system. The 'Standard' mode, often chosen for its general applicability, can still lead to undesirable speed variations, as evidenced by the incident where the car reached 78 km/h in a 50 km/h zone.

Consequences of Limited Control: The Speeding Ticket Scenario

In regions like Quebec, exceeding the speed limit by 10 to 20 km/h might often go unnoticed by law enforcement, provided driving is not erratic. However, an excess of 28 km/h, as experienced, falls squarely within ticket territory. Had the previous custom speed offset feature been available, the author would have set a more conservative limit, preventing the incident. The current preset system leaves drivers with limited options, forcing a choice between overly cautious or overly aggressive driving behaviors, with no 'just right' setting.

The Deterioration of FSD Usage on Local Roads

This limitation in speed control has directly impacted the author's willingness to engage FSD on non-highway routes. While FSD performs adequately on highways, maintaining a comfortable cruising speed, its behavior on local roads with varying speed limits and enforcement tolerances becomes problematic. The risk of receiving traffic violations significantly reduces the appeal of using FSD in these environments.

A Call for Tesla to Reintroduce User-Centric Controls

This situation exemplifies a recurring trend where Tesla prioritizes system autonomy over user control, assuming its technology can account for all variables. Speed, however, involves nuanced judgment based on road conditions, traffic, local regulations, and personal risk tolerance. These factors are best managed by the driver. Tesla had previously implemented an effective solution with the custom speed offset, allowing drivers to integrate their judgment into the system. The removal of this feature, replaced by a less flexible preset system, represents a regression in functionality. While drivers remain ultimately responsible for their vehicles, Tesla should provide the necessary tools for them to exercise that responsibility effectively. Reinstating the custom speed offset is crucial for enhancing FSD's utility and user satisfaction, particularly on non-highway route

See More