Electric Cars

Experience Grand Touring Redefined: Classic Soul, Modern Refinement.

The Genesis of Refinement: From Track Beast to Touring Elegance

Kamm, the esteemed Hungarian automotive restorer, has unveiled its latest masterpiece: the 912T. This new creation diverges from their previously launched, uncompromising track-oriented 912C. The 'T' in 912T signifies 'Touring,' highlighting its fundamental shift towards enhanced road usability and driver comfort, proving that the Porsche 912, often overshadowed by its six-cylinder sibling, can stand proudly as a sophisticated and capable machine in its own right.

Engineered for the Open Road: Power and Smoothness Reimagined

A significant aspect of the 912T's new character lies in the enhancements made to its 2.0-liter air-cooled flat-four engine. To foster a more manageable and enjoyable on-road experience, the engine's redline has been adjusted to 6500rpm. Power delivery has been meticulously recalibrated for greater tractability, complemented by the installation of a quieter, non-valved exhaust system. Furthermore, the updated five-speed manual transmission features revised gearing, specifically tailored to optimize everyday driving on public roads.

Luxurious Interior and Integrated Technology: Seamlessly Blending Eras

Beyond mechanical refinements, Kamm has dedicated attention to the 912T's interior and ride quality. The bespoke Tractive dampers have been fine-tuned to deliver a notably more comfortable ride. Inside, passengers are welcomed by touring-style bucket seats designed for long-distance comfort. For those desiring modern conveniences, options such as a contemporary sound system and wireless phone charging are available. These technological additions are ingeniously integrated to ensure they do not detract from the vehicle's authentic vintage ambiance, preserving its classic allure.

Lightweight Design and Dynamic Performance: A Spirited Companion

Despite its focus on comfort and refinement, the 912T remains a remarkably agile and spirited vehicle. Its engine generates a robust 161 horsepower and 148 lb-ft of torque. Coupled with an exceptionally low curb weight of merely 860kg—approximately 100kg lighter than an original 912—the car achieves an impressive power-to-weight ratio of 187bhp per tonne. This significant weight reduction is largely attributable to the use of carbon fiber for essential body components including the bumpers, wings, bonnet, and boot lid.

Precision Engineering and Exclusivity: Craftsmanship Beyond Compare

The engineering excellence extends further with individual throttle bodies, custom intake and exhaust primaries, and upgraded cylinder heads and pistons enhancing engine performance. Underneath, a ZF limited-slip differential and a bespoke hydraulic clutch contribute to superior handling and power transfer. The 912T is offered in both coupe and Targa configurations, with pricing commencing at €245,000 (excluding the donor vehicle). Production will be conducted in limited batches of five units, with manufacturing scheduled to begin in the early part of next year, ensuring exclusivity and meticulous craftsmanship.

Recent analyses suggest that the current administration's efforts to dismantle established environmental regulations could inadvertently lead to a surge in fuel prices across the nation. While the Environmental Protection Agency initially presented these policy shifts as a means to alleviate financial burdens on consumers, a deeper dive into energy projections reveals a contrasting outcome, indicating potential economic strain for American households. This divergence highlights a critical debate surrounding the interplay between environmental stewardship and economic policy, particularly concerning the cost of daily transportation.

The proposed changes to the 2009 endangerment finding, which dictates greenhouse gas emissions, are at the heart of this controversy. Proponents argue that relaxing these standards would spur economic growth and offer consumers more choice in vehicle purchases, citing potential trillion-dollar savings for businesses and families. However, critics, supported by energy data, contend that such deregulation would inevitably drive up demand for conventional gasoline-powered vehicles, consequently pushing fuel prices higher and negating any projected savings. This scenario presents a complex challenge for policymakers striving to balance economic interests with environmental responsibilities.

The Economic Implications of Regulatory Reversal

The Environmental Protection Agency’s announcement regarding the potential repeal of the 2009 endangerment finding, a cornerstone of greenhouse gas emission regulations, has sparked considerable debate. While the EPA framed this initiative as a pathway to restore consumer choice and reduce living costs by eliminating what it termed “hidden taxes” on American businesses and families, promising annual savings of $54 billion, critical data suggests a different economic trajectory. This proposed rollback, aimed at repealing greenhouse gas emission regulations for motor vehicles and engines, was initially touted as a significant financial relief, projecting savings that could exceed $1 trillion over time. However, this optimistic outlook is increasingly being challenged by independent analyses that forecast an adverse impact on everyday expenses, particularly for motorists.

The core argument for the rollback centers on the idea of unfettered market dynamics leading to lower costs and greater flexibility for both automakers and consumers. The EPA administrator emphasized ending years of uncertainty and allowing Americans greater purchasing freedom. This perspective overlooks the potential for unintended consequences, specifically a rise in demand for less fuel-efficient vehicles, which would, in turn, increase overall gasoline consumption. The claim of substantial savings, while appealing, may not account for the broader economic ripple effects of such a policy shift. The administration's rhetoric focuses on immediate, visible savings, yet fails to fully address the long-term, systemic costs associated with increased reliance on fossil fuels and the potential market imbalances that could arise from deregulation.

Rising Fuel Costs: An Unforeseen Consequence

Despite the Environmental Protection Agency’s initial assurances of significant annual savings for American consumers through the repeal of emission standards, a recent report, drawing on data from both the EPA and the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), paints a concerning picture: gas prices are projected to rise. This counter-intuitive outcome stems from the anticipated increase in demand for gasoline-powered vehicles and their fuel if emission policies are relaxed. The EIA's projections specifically indicate that without the environmental policies established by the previous administration, gasoline prices are likely to climb, a direct contradiction to the promised economic benefits of deregulation. This suggests that while the rollback might appear to offer short-term advantages, its long-term effect could be a higher financial burden for daily commuters and businesses.

Under the Biden administration, stringent fuel efficiency targets were set, aiming for new gas-powered cars to achieve 47.1 miles per gallon (mpg) by 2027 and approximately 61.2 mpg by 2035. In contrast, under the proposed regulatory changes, vehicles manufactured in 2027 would only be expected to meet a lower standard of 43.6 mpg, slowly increasing to 50.5 mpg by 2035. This reduced efficiency directly correlates with higher fuel consumption. Experts, such as former EIA administrator Joseph DeCarolis, highlight a clear causal link: by disincentivizing electric vehicle adoption through relaxed tailpipe standards, more consumers will opt for gasoline cars, inevitably leading to higher gasoline consumption and elevated prices for everyone. This increase in fuel costs would not only affect individual drivers but also trigger a ripple effect throughout the economy, potentially raising prices for goods and services due to increased trucking costs, thereby undermining job growth and overall economic stability. The administration's focus on economic growth without acknowledging these potential inflationary pressures on essential commodities like fuel suggests a significant oversight in its policy planning.