Cars
2025 Hyundai IONIQ 9 vs. 2025 Kia EV9: Electric 3-Row SUV Showdown

In the rapidly evolving landscape of electric vehicles, the advent of sophisticated three-row SUVs marks a significant stride. This detailed analysis pits two formidable contenders against each other: the brand-new 2025 Hyundai IONIQ 9 and the 2025 Kia EV9. Both Korean automotive giants have made impressive advancements in the EV sector, offering compelling alternatives to traditional gasoline-powered vehicles. This comparison aims to dissect their offerings, scrutinizing everything from their cost-effectiveness and operational range to their dynamic performance capabilities, interior comfort, and thoughtful family-oriented features. By exploring these facets, prospective buyers will gain a comprehensive understanding of which all-electric SUV best aligns with their individual needs and desires, be it for uncompromised luxury, spirited performance, or supreme practicality in daily driving.

Electric SUV Showdown: Hyundai IONIQ 9 Battles Kia EV9 for Three-Row Dominance

In the dynamic realm of electric vehicles, a fascinating rivalry is unfolding between two esteemed Korean automakers, Hyundai and Kia, particularly within the three-row SUV segment. As of late August 2025, the automotive world keenly observes the fresh arrival of the Hyundai IONIQ 9, a vehicle poised to challenge the established presence of the Kia EV9. The EV9, which pioneered as the nation's premier three-row electric SUV, boasts remarkable innovations such as its adaptable rotating second-row seating, integrated passenger footrests, and a surprisingly ample third-row cabin, ensuring comfort for all occupants.

The Hyundai IONIQ 9 enters the fray equipped with many of these celebrated attributes, yet distinguishes itself through unique design aesthetics, ingenious functional enhancements, and its competitive pricing structure. While both SUVs offer the robust capabilities of all-wheel drive and impressive ranges, subtle yet significant differences emerge when evaluating their financial outlays, power outputs, and family-centric amenities.

Regarding financial investment, the Kia EV9 initiates its journey with the Light RWD variant at approximately $54,900, ascending to around $71,900 for the premium GT-Line AWD. In contrast, the Hyundai IONIQ 9's base S trim commences at a slightly higher figure of $58,955, peaking at roughly $76,490 for the opulent Calligraphy Design. This marginal price difference, observed across their respective lineups, prompts a deeper examination into what each model truly delivers for its value.

In terms of operational range, the rear-wheel-drive Kia EV9 commands an estimated 335 miles on a single charge, with its all-wheel-drive counterpart typically achieving about 280 miles, and an extended range model pushing this to roughly 304 miles. The Hyundai IONIQ 9, in its rear-wheel-drive configuration, mirrors the 335-mile range, while its all-wheel-drive version often extends to 311 miles, with real-world observations indicating potential for up to 327 miles, especially under moderate climatic conditions.

Performance-wise, the Hyundai IONIQ 9 takes a decisive lead. While the Kia EV9's horsepower varies from 215 for the single-motor RWD to 379 for the dual-motor AWD, and a rumored 500+ horsepower for an upcoming GT model, the IONIQ 9, in its readily available trims, showcases superior power. Its base RWD model generates 215 horsepower, escalating to 303 horsepower with AWD, and culminating in a robust 422 horsepower in the Performance AWD Limited trim. This translates into a noticeably more spirited and effortless driving experience, particularly for navigating varied terrains or accelerating onto highways, making the IONIQ 9 feel surprisingly agile despite its substantial 6,008-pound mass.

From a spatial perspective, the IONIQ 9 also offers a more generous environment. Measuring 2 inches longer, 0.1 inches wider, and 1.6 inches taller than the Kia EV9, and boasting a 1.2-inch longer wheelbase, the Hyundai provides increased passenger comfort and cargo capacity. The IONIQ 9 offers 21.9 cubic feet of storage behind the third row, expanding to 46.7 cubic feet with the third row folded, and an expansive 86.9 cubic feet with both rear rows stowed, proving highly practical for family outings and substantial hauls. The third row, in particular, impresses with its ample legroom, headroom, and expansive windows, mitigating motion sickness and enhancing overall passenger enjoyment, even for taller adults.

Both vehicles are replete with advanced features designed for modern families. The IONIQ 9’s Calligraphy Design model features “relaxation seats” in the second row with dynamic massage functions and recline capabilities, complete with footrests and a panoramic sunroof, enhancing long-distance travel comfort. A highlight is the sliding center console, which adjusts by seven inches, optimizing space and accessibility. While American versions of the EV9 do not offer the 180-degree swivel function for the second row found in some markets, it does include thoughtful amenities such as an intercom system for communication with the third row, winged headrests for improved comfort, and ventilated second-row seating. Both SUVs also boast customizable ambient lighting, clever storage solutions, and excellent visibility, solidifying their positions as top contenders in the electric family SUV market.

The Evolving Electric Landscape: A Personal Reflection

As I reflect on the intense competition between the Hyundai IONIQ 9 and the Kia EV9, it's clear that these automotive innovations are not just about transport; they represent a significant step forward in our understanding and embrace of sustainable living. For a discerning consumer, the choice between these two electric titans goes beyond mere specifications—it’s about aligning a vehicle with one's lifestyle, values, and vision for the future. The subtle distinctions in design, from the IONIQ 9's premium, almost luxurious exterior to the EV9's youthful, edgy aesthetic, speak volumes about the brands' philosophies. It’s a testament to how far electric vehicle technology has come, offering not just an alternative, but a superior, more thoughtful driving experience. This evolution challenges us to reconsider what we prioritize in a vehicle: raw power, lavish comfort, or eco-conscious efficiency. Ultimately, both models push the boundaries of what's possible in the electric vehicle segment, inspiring a future where luxury, performance, and environmental responsibility coexist seamlessly.

Electric Vehicles: A Comprehensive Analysis of Their Environmental Superiority Over Gasoline Cars

A groundbreaking study conducted by the University of Michigan has provided definitive evidence that electric vehicles (EVs) are unequivocally more environmentally friendly than their gasoline-powered counterparts, a finding that holds true across every state in the continental U.S. This comprehensive research, which its authors assert is the most exhaustive to date, meticulously analyzed the entire lifecycle environmental impact of various vehicle types. The findings underscore the critical role of vehicle electrification in combating climate change, highlighting the significant reduction in greenhouse gas emissions achievable through the widespread adoption of electric mobility. This study not only validates the long-held belief in EVs' environmental superiority but also dispels any lingering doubts about their ecological benefits, regardless of regional differences in electricity generation or driving patterns.

The research, led by Greg Keoleian, a professor at the University of Michigan's School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS) and senior author of the study, meticulously assessed the environmental footprint of vehicles from their manufacturing to their disposal – a concept referred to as 'cradle-to-grave.' This thorough approach sets it apart from previous studies, offering a holistic view of emissions that factors in vehicle class, driving habits, and geographical location. The study encompassed a wide array of powertrains, including traditional internal combustion engines, hybrid electric vehicles, plug-in hybrids, and fully electric vehicles. For plug-in hybrids, the researchers also took into account the proportion of driving done on battery power versus gasoline, providing a nuanced understanding of their environmental performance.

A key revelation from the study is that electric vehicles consistently exhibit lower emissions throughout their entire operational life compared to any other vehicle type, a conclusion that remains valid across all counties within the contiguous United States. This finding is particularly salient when considering the environmental impact of popular vehicle segments. For instance, the study points out that gasoline-powered pickup trucks, a dominant presence on American roads, are among the biggest polluters. In stark contrast, an electric pickup truck, even when carrying a substantial 2,500 pounds of cargo, was shown to emit 30% less greenhouse gas than an unloaded internal combustion engine truck. Conversely, compact electric sedans emerged as the vehicles with the lowest emissions, primarily due to their superior per-mile efficiency and smaller battery requirements.

This extensive analysis also sheds light on certain prevailing trends within American car culture that may inadvertently hinder environmental progress. The study suggests that many consumers often opt for electric vehicles with capabilities and range far exceeding their actual needs, which can compromise overall efficiency. Keoleian emphasizes the importance of aligning vehicle choices with individual requirements. For professionals in trades requiring a pickup truck, he recommends electric pickup options. For individuals primarily commuting alone, a compact electric sedan is presented as the optimal choice, demonstrating that thoughtful vehicle selection can significantly contribute to emission reductions and support broader climate action goals. Such informed decisions, according to the study, are crucial for maximizing the environmental benefits of transitioning to electric transportation.

See More
Ford Recalls Nearly 1.7 Million Vehicles in Four New Campaigns

Ford Motor Company has recently initiated four additional recall campaigns, impacting a substantial 1.7 million vehicles from its Ford and Lincoln lineups. These latest actions contribute to a concerning trend for the automaker, which has now amassed 108 recalls this year alone, accounting for nearly 40 percent of all vehicle recalls in the United States. This ongoing series of recalls highlights the critical importance of vehicle safety and manufacturer accountability.

Detailed Report on Ford's Latest Safety Campaigns

In a significant development for vehicle owners, Ford has issued four new recalls as mandated by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). These recalls encompass a broad spectrum of models and manufacturing years, extending back to 2015, and address distinct safety concerns.

The first recall targets approximately 355,656 units of the 2025 Ford F-150 and 2025-2026 Ford Super Duty models. The core issue lies with the instrument panel cluster, which may fail to activate upon startup. This malfunction can obscure crucial gauges and warning indicators, posing a heightened risk of accidents. Ford's investigation revealed that a specific timing conflict during the display's sleep entry sequence could trigger a memory protection fault. Owners have been advised to visit dealerships for a software update designed to bypass this protective feature, with notifications already underway.

The second recall affects a considerable 499,129 vehicles, including the 2015-2018 Ford Edge and 2016-2018 Lincoln MKX. This campaign addresses a potentially dangerous issue where the rear brake jounce hose may rupture, leading to brake fluid leakage. Such a leak can result in increased pedal travel and extended stopping distances, significantly compromising vehicle safety. Although the precise root cause remains under investigation, Ford noted a reduction in repair incidents after improving the hose's durability in 2017. The NHTSA brought this concern to Ford's attention in March 2021, and affected owners will be informed once a definitive repair solution is identified.

A third recall impacts 213,121 units of the 2025 Ford Explorer and 2025 Lincoln Aviator. These vehicles may be equipped with a body control module featuring improperly soldered components. This defect can prevent the taillights from illuminating when a trailer is connected to the vehicle's electrical tow connector. Furthermore, this issue could also lead to malfunctions in power windows, mirror switches, glove box lights, vanity lights, dome lamps, the alarm system, and USB chargers. Drivers might also encounter a trailer error message on the instrument display. Ford plans to inform owners via mail, instructing them to have their vehicles inspected at a dealership. For vehicles with fewer than 9,000 miles, the module will be replaced proactively. For those exceeding this mileage, a diagnostic test will be performed, and the module will be replaced if it exhibits faulty operation.

Finally, a recall for 100,900 units of the 2024-2026 Ford Ranger addresses a critical airbag safety concern. During deployment, the side-curtain airbags in these vehicles might come into contact with the inner reinforcement flange of the B-pillar, potentially causing the airbag to tear. This tear could diminish the airbag's protective capabilities, increasing the risk of severe injury or fatality in the event of a collision and failing to meet federal safety standards. Ford began notifying owners this week, directing them to dealerships for the installation of protective shields to mitigate this risk.

From a journalist's perspective, these recurrent and widespread recalls from Ford are a clarion call for enhanced scrutiny of manufacturing quality control within the automotive industry. While recalls are an essential safety mechanism, the sheer volume of Ford's recalls this year raises questions about the robustness of their design, testing, and production processes. It underscores the immense responsibility automakers bear for passenger safety and the long-term trust consumers place in their brands. This situation also highlights the critical role of regulatory bodies like the NHTSA in holding manufacturers accountable and ensuring the public's well-being on the roads. For consumers, this serves as a stark reminder to remain vigilant about recall notices and to prioritize addressing any identified safety defects promptly to safeguard themselves and their loved ones.

See More